Categories
Uncategorized

Cult

here’s the result. this is what being in a cult looks like. The complete collapse of reason, replaced by magical thinking, a belief in salvation, a religious zeal, visions, fanaticism. These are comments of Americans in my home town in Kentucky

Categories
Uncategorized

Briefing For a Descent Into Hell

Well, that’s the title of Doris Lessing’s 1971 book, Briefing For a Descent Into Hell. Which I bought as a kid but never read. Always meant to though…

Back then I thought it was science fiction, but for fuck’s sake now…

Feldman’s reply here (in the video clip) is of course weaker than, …I don’t know…, a mattress of hot Krispy Creme donuts for those trying to rest with debilitating spinal injury. 

The sickly response:

“to compare what CNN and MSNBC are doing, to what FoxNews and NewsMax are doing, is just mind-boggling to me”

– Andrew Feldman

And that precisely is THE problem. Without wrapping your mind around the fact that CNN and MSNBC have become over the last 20 years, MORE willing to distort reality, more willing to ignore facts, more willing to lie, and more willing to spin BIGGER lies, about issues of far greater importance, than Foxnews or “Qanon”, …without recognizing that, American public discourse will remain sunk, in a bog, of sewage, with no possibilty for meaningful, reasonable, discourse about anything.

Have you not noticed the descent into the abyss, of corporate owned American media since 1980?

Reasonableness dropped off a cliff in the last 4 decades. Here’s what I’ve seen:

I’ve watched the total transformation of American media since 1980 with eyes wide open, beginning with the introduction of “conservative” talk radio, which was basically unhinged (insane) from the beginning. And was in contrast to normal American media which still operated in accordance with the fairness doctrine and a still present residual of the Franklin Roosevelt era.

Put American media since 1980 on a graph to measure the degree of psychotic separation from reality and reason on the Y axis, with two bars on the X axis, one for conservative media (talk radio, then FoxNews). And another bar for mainstream media (NYT, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, etc.)

The Y axis is a measure of reasonableness, or lack of it. Put a scale on the Y axis: completely reasonable, an ideal reasonableness, is as tall as a doorway.

In the 1980s and 90s, mainstream media (NYT, CNN, MSNBC, NPR) would rise about mid way I’d say, up to the door handle. 

Conservative talk radio and FoxNews lowered the bar. Their bar was below the door handle, down around your knees.

The problem, is what happened since.

NYT, CNN, MSNBC, NPR didn’t increase, or even maintain, their higher standard (of reason). They nose-dived to the floor, racing conservative media to the bottom, and “won”.

Today, the “mainstream” media (NYT, CNN, MSNBC, NPR) is below knee level, lying on the floor. And yet, as if by some kind of force, is pulling itself further down, into the abyss. Without limit. There is no floor.

The typical American and European news viewer didn’t notice this descent into hell. 

That’s apparent.

They’re mesmerized. Stupefied.

They think they’re pointing their fingers DOWN at FoxNews and typical conservative media, while by now they’re pointing UP to point at those, and continuing their fall. 

Now sunk to such depth, buried both by darkness, and distance from reality, they no longer see what they’re pointing at. But the pointing and screaming continues nonetheless, the incoherent ranting, of drowning lunatics, breathing water now, sinking, to the ocean floor, and beyond, sinking into the core of the earth.

The media we’re trained to watch is now so deranged, so psychotic, so detached from reality, that it makes Donald Trump look like a modern day Isaac Newton.

I’m not saying he IS. Please. Ed Curtain describes precisely what all these “political” actors are. It’s a show. Nothing more: https://off-guardian.org/2020/12/07/the-past-lives-on-the-elite-strategy-to-divide-and-conquer/  

What’s new is that the elites are bored with this game. I can only recommend this article which I think is the most important I’ve read in a long time, by Alex Bartlett: https://off-guardian.org/2020/12/05/together-but-falling-apart/

Categories
Uncategorized

Let’s Talk about Doctors

We’re taught, I mean actively, we’re taught to respect and even admire doctors. Above all, to trust them. This teaching happens in many ways.

Education itself, I mean, first of all, it’s the primary lesson, the very purpose of education. What did we learn from 12 years of school, plus “university” after that? Really not much. Think about it.

If you can think. Can you, after being educated? You probably can’t. You’ve been trained specifically not to think. It’s been drilled out of you. In place of thinking, you’re taught to respect and obey, and if you’re a really enthusiastic student, to trust and admire those in authority, those who declare themselves to be in authority.

Are you trained to formulate high quality questions? To ask hard questions? Are you trained in any kind of structural, or non-structural, approach to thinking? Do you even know what it means to think about something?

Oh, WTF am I talking about?

How about this:

Is there any relationship between education and thinking? How about doctors? Do they think? Are they paid to think? I’ll come back to that.

It’s a big club. You ain’t in it.

In their club, they declare themselves to be in authority. And they cultivate a hierarchy consisting of a phalanx of paid shills bloviating about those in authority, at the top. Everything beneath the bloviating top is disciplined by systematic corruption:

  • Doctors are paid to dispense pharmaceutical products. The form of the payment varies in different countries, but the effect is always the same.
  • Mass media is owned by pharmaceutical companies. Newspapers and television stations depend on revenue from pharmaceutical advertising. Pharma advertising was legalized in the United States

Articles about direct to consumer advertising (DCTA) of pharmaceuticals are easily found. Here are two:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/reenitadas/2019/05/14/direct-to-consumer-drug-ads-are-they-doing-more-harm-than-good/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2690298/

From the former:

The Prescription Drug DTCA Industry Landscape

DTC drug ads

DTC drug ads GETTY IMAGES

DTCA (direct to consumer advertising) for pharmaceuticals was legalized in 1997. Despite its relatively short 22-year existence, it has heavily impacted the advertising landscape for U.S. healthcare and stands in stark contrast to forms of legal advertising for drugs in other countries around the world. In the face of controversy and questions surrounding the ethics of DTCA, the U.S. and New Zealand remain the only two countries in the world that allow this practice. The U.S. may remain the only one if the draft of the Therapeutic Products Bill in New Zealand manages to include a ban on prescription drug advertising.

While DTCA has some positive effects, these commercials tend to mislead patients and can result in the breakdown of the doctor-patient relationship. Between 1983 to 2013, a span of 30 years, 449 articles about DTC prescription drug ads were published.[1] These articles dissected the various pros and cons of the practice. The pros were primarily based on the belief that when patients saw ads for drugs that aligned with their symptoms, they would start a dialogue with their physician and take a more active role in their healthcare journey. Despite this well-intended strategy, DTCA of prescription drugs has shown the potential to jeopardize the doctor-patient relationship. According to an FDA survey, 65% of physicians said that DTCA for drugs sent confusing messages to the patients, and 8% claimed that they felt pressured to prescribe brand-name drugs after patients cited a DTC drug ad.[2]

The routine use of DTCA and its adverse effects resulted in the AMA taking a stand against this type of advertising. The AMA was concerned that “a growing proliferation of ads is driving demand for expensive treatments despite the clinical effectiveness of less costly alternatives.” The AMA’s stance is representative of the growing skepticism surrounding DTCA in the medical community. If the largest association of physicians in the country is voicing its concerns about this practice, why do pharmaceutical companies continue to use DTCA?

According to the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), there has been a drastic increase in DTC prescription drug marketing budgets, jumping from $1.3 billion in 1997 to more than $6 billion in 2016.[3]; that is a 361% increase. These companies use DTCA to promote prescription drugs because it increases the volume of drugs sold. A 2008 House Commerce Committee found that for every $1,000 spent on prescription drug ads, 24 new patients were added for the pharma industry. Additionally, a 2003 research report found that rates for prescription drugs with ads were almost seven times greater than for those without ads.[4]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/reenitadas/2019/05/14/direct-to-consumer-drug-ads-are-they-doing-more-harm-than-good/ Global Healthcare Outlook, 2019
 FROST & SULLIVAN

2 points about DCTA:

One

Articles such as those above describe the effect of direct to consumer advertising on drug sales. This is the typical advertising scenario. You motivate people to want your product, and if effective then you sell more product.

But that is not the primary effect, or purpose, of DCTA. The primary effect and purpose is ownership of mass media. Newspapers and television have, as is well known, lost their traditional advertising revenue streams due to the pressures first of the growth of the internet, and the concomitant shifting of advertising from traditional media to the web as readers left traditional and advertisers followed, and secondly, pressure from social media which, amplified the web effect and left TV and newspaper media high and dry, starved of ad revenue, on the brink of collapse.

But, you see, DCTA!

The effect of this condition is obvious. Mass media is owned and operated by pharmaceutical companies (plus their buddies in the war/arms industries).

This means that pharmaceutical companies are in control of hiring and firing. They exert editorial control. I laugh when I write that. Editorial control. Ha! There’s nothing to edit. They’re in control of content. They WRITE the content. They don’t edit it. They write it.

Two

You think, “well I don’t live in the United States, so, that doesn’t happen here.”

Think again. You live in an empire. The tentacles of total corruption are strangling your institutions as well, by various means. These can be studied. But only after one is willing to recognize that such a thing can exist.

If you are unwilling to say, “oh, such a thing may exist”, then you will never look, and you will never see. But if you are willing to look, then you can see. Perhaps you will find it interesting that your country has signed contracts with the WHO and with Bill Gates individually, contracts that REQUIRE your authorities to follow orders given by WHO and Bill Gates:

https://seed126.bitchute.com/a4ZOvnWvqOPk/vGRIgKFhe87O.mp4

Doctors

There are different kinds of doctors. Like everyone else, most are intellectually lazy, incurious sychophant dullards. They’re educated more than most people, which means they’re even more obedient. Their work routines are simple recipe-following. Pharma companies instruct them on what to do when presented with whatever symptoms, which drugs to order in response. Largely this function can be automated, so doctors have reason to be concerned about the future viability of their profession.

In the mean time, they’re financially incentivized/rewarded for prescription. Little thought is required. In fact, it impedes.

Principle, morality, benefit to patient, these are obsolete notions. That is to say, in the actually existing environment within which the medical profession operates, with corruption so profound, so pervasive, “benefit to patient”, that concept sank to the bottom of the ocean long ago. And doctors are not exerting themselves to raise the bar.

I mean, there are exceptions, but the profession as a whole is complicit and is largely responsible for at least half the human population being interned, permanent gulag life.

There are exceptions. Some speak out for truth, against corruption, against crimes against humanity waged with their profession as the instrument. But they are suppressed.

Absolutely nothing about COVID-19 is scientific. It is entirely a top-down totally corrupt extortion scheme inflicted on the world by psychotic life long criminal frauds (Fauci, NIH, Gates, et al)

From Paul Bruno:

“A climate of fear is preventing experts from questioning the handling of the pandemic, with reputations smeared, jobs lost and even families threatened.Much abuse has come from within academic or professional circles, with one professor saying debate was becoming impossible because “we are not talking to each other properly. We are being thrown into confrontational positions.” Many leading experts have withdrawn from the debate after having reputations smeared, jobs lost and even families threatened raising questions about pandemic policy. This month alone has seen one leading medic, working to protect vulnerable children, forced to abandon a project to safeguard youngsters after their name was sullied when they questioned the government approach.

Another expert has been sidelined from a vital role on a government advisory group, while senior NHS staff have been threatened with disciplinary measures for questioning the government approach online or in the media.Senior academics say they have feared losing vital funding, warned not to speak out with the threat of disciplinary action or deemed ‘outliers’ for their views on lockdown.

At least two scientists have been subjected to public abuse by scientific colleagues who disagreed with their academic view.

One critic posted a grotesque image superimposed on a professor after he disagreed with his view. Other posts by scientists have branded colleagues “charlatans” and “snake oil merchants”.

A prominent professor accused a fellow academic of “deliberately subverting public health” on a twitter post after disagreeing with her views on managing the pandemic.

In another case a government scientific advisor called a university boss to try to stop one of its professors from criticising government policy.

Retired Supreme Court Lord Sumption told a podcast this week that he was a reluctant figurehead for questioning lockdown – but felt obliged because of the way critics had been treated.

He said the attacks were damaging to free speech. He said: “I have faced many defamatory things said to me on Twitter and to the media, including by other scientists who have even accused me of manipulating data. It becomes quite nasty.

“We are not talking to each other properly and there are many things we do not understand about this pandemic which we need to learn. But we are being thrown into confrontational positions on things, sometimes by the media and sometimes by the government. This is a bad atmosphere in which we can learn.

“Some of this culture is down to ego, but some people honestly believe only their way will solve things and will not listen to other peoples’ views.

“There is a range of disciplines including virologists, public health doctors, statisticians and clinicians and we don’t automatically understand each other.

“We don’t see the whole picture and it is very harmful in a pandemic if we are in a position where we cannot have a free discussion.

“I live on the positive support from the scientific community and I will not engage in this. I did get a bit down but many colleagues, my family and my teenage children have helped me to keep questioning where policy is not following science.

Professor Carl Heneghan, Director of Oxford University’s Centre for Evidence Based Medicine said: “An envelope of fear has engulfed the debate around covid. Scientists who suggested an alternative way have been subject to attack, ridicule and threats by others. I have been called an “agent of disinformation” and one scientist even called me a “public health threat” on twitter. I’m happy to discuss any issue where people believe I got something wrong. But Science only operates if it continually opens up questions, uncertainty and debate. There is no such thing as “the science.”A consultant in the north of England said: “Many of us clinicians want to put more emphasis on the unintended consequences of lockdown that are harming people and these stories need looking at with the same vigour as coronavirus.“But everyone is so terrified of speaking out. I know of one senior NHS manager who was threatened with job loss..”

Allyson Pollock, a leading public health professor said funding also played a part because a significant proportion of academic research funds and university revenue is derived from the government.

She said: “Universities don’t want to upset the government because they rely on government funding. If academics criticise government policies there is often pushback.”Dr Kamran Abbasi Executive of the BMJ said: “Increasingly NHS clinicians are unable to express their concerns about the NHS service provision in case they are deemed to stray into political territory.”

He added: “Science is about debate and rarely absolute. Once we start attacking each other it has gone out of the realm of science and become personal. However debate needs to be encouraged as it is only this way that we can get closer to the truth.”A spokesman for the General Medical Council which regulates registered doctors said: “Good medical practice says that doctors must treat colleagues fairly and with respect. As outlined in our social media guidance, this expectation covers all situations and all forms of interaction and communication. We say doctor’s must not bully, harass, or make gratuitous, unsubstantiated or comments about individuals online.”

This is the original article, but it’s like swatting flies to evade the disturbing adds popping up from all sides continually blocking your vision and disturbing your attention, so I copy-pasted the entire text of it in my comment, but here it is anyway for reference sake:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1415896/climate-fear-handling-pandemic-experts-jobs-lost-families-threats

The corruption of science is not new.

While you “fucking LOVE science”…

Fauci loves FUCKING science.

Covid

This is testimony about the medical professions’ systematic withholding of any treatment at all for respiratory patients who receive a positive Covid test, for 2 weeks until they then arrive at a hospital.

If that doesn’t strike you as abnormal, and even on the surface, as stupid, then do a self sanity check now. For those who’ve recognized this systematic failure/refusal to treat patients, the testimony here paints a clear and extremely disturbing picture. The picture happens to be consistent with decades worth of similar malfeasance surrounding Anthony Fauci, NIH, et al.

I’ll come back to this.

Corruption

https://www.globalresearch.ca/fauci-first-fraud-documentary-exposes-decades-old-lies-behind-man-cancelled-thanksgiving/5730282

Fauci’s credibility

Duration 1:33:49 Fauci’s First Fraud is a 2020 independent film exposing how Fauci perpetuated misinformation over the AIDS pandemic leading to millions of deaths.“The Nobel Prize winner who discovered HIV, Luc Montagnier, said it does not cause AIDS,” explained producer, Ken McCarthy in an email interview.

“Another Nobel Prize winner, Kary Mullis — the one who invented the HIV PCR test that Fauci used to find ‘infected cases’ among the healthy — called the use of the test for diagnosis of AIDS a fraud.”

Sound familiar?

Watch the film at the link.

Remarkable Parallels Between the AIDS and COVID Scare.

The description for this documentary about the 1980’s AIDS scamdemic reads like the COVID-19 headlines of 2020:

“A deadly new virus is discovered… There’s no treatment or cure… It’s highly contagious… Everyone is a potential victim… The world is at risk from asymptomatic super spreaders… New clusters of cases reported daily…“

Everyone must get tested even though the tests are unreliable… Positive antibody tests are called ‘infections’ and ‘cases’ even when the patient has no symptoms… Every politician gets involved… Media hysteria in high gear… Activists demand salvation from government and Big Pharma…

“Billions of dollars are authorized for fast track drug and vaccine research… Simple, effective remedies are rejected while expensive, dangerous ones are pushed……Presumptive diagnoses… Exaggerated death statistics… Falsified death certificates…”

It would seem that the only significant factor differentiating the AIDS pandemic from the COVID scandal is scale. As McCarthy explains:

“Every single fraud technique being used today to ‘sell’ COVID hysteria was invented in the 1980s and 1990s by Tony Fauci to sell the AIDS fraud.”

The New Normal May Not Be All That New After All

The documentary presents a compilation of interviews, press releases and documents collected from YouTube, VHS, periodicals and even an audio cassette, showing the parallels between the new normal theater of 2020 with the HIV scare of the 1980s and 90s.

For example, the documentary includes an interview with Charles Geshekter Ph.D., a three-time Fulbright scholar who teaches African history at California State University in Chico. He explains how the WHO came to the conclusion that AIDS in Africa could be diagnosed with a broad list of common symptoms, just like COVID:

“A fever, a persistent cough, loose stools for 30 days, and a ten-percent loss of bodyweight over a two month period.”

The entire film is packed with such parallels. Another example, later in the documentary, states: “Over the last 36 years, Fauci has repeated the claim that all his AIDS patients were ‘otherwise healthy.’ ”

Yet, a clip with a gay historian, Mark Gabrish Conlan, shows that such victims were not healthy at all:

“The very first AIDS cases were five gay men diagnosed in Los Angeles in 1981… What linked them was that they were all in the ‘fast lane gay lifestyle…’ They were taking many different [recreational] drugs at the same time, combining drugs, much more than was the pattern for straight drug users. They also partied a lot, at the bars, the clubs, the bathhouses. They met a lot of men, had a lot of anonymous sexual contact. As a result they were exposed to a lot of the classic sexually transmitted diseases — like syphilis and gonorrhea. Because they were getting those diseases, they were also frequently going to doctors and getting antibiotic prescriptions….”

“All that created a situation where a handful of gay men were burning the candle at both ends and putting a blowtorch to the middle. It’s no wonder that after a while their immune systems started to collapse and they started getting sick in these unusual ways that previously had only been seen in older people whose immune systems had deteriorated from age.”

Today, Fauci and company have expanded their case load from a fringe group of homosexuals to the 73 million baby boomer population in the United States.Of course, we are now being told, the old are dying from COVID-19. As if, before the coronavirus went novel, frail nursing home residents were “otherwise healthy” and not already succumbing to respiratory diseases.

Just like, before AIDS, the overuse of antibiotics and a wide range of “party” drugs by a small subset of the gay male community was not severely compromising to health.

These recreational drugs included “poppers,” an immune-suppressing inhalant widely used and sold in gay clubs and bathhouses. As the documentary shows, poppers were heavily advertised in most gay magazines.

Of course, why would heavy narcotic use have anything to do with the collapse of their immune system? We are assured, two-thirds through the film, by much younger version of Anthony Fauci:

“There have been a number of theories as to what the origin of HIV/AIDS is. One of them was a theory that certainly turned out to be completely incorrect — that it is a lifestyle phenomenon.”

Anthony Fauci

36 Years of Lies, Misinformation and Manipulation

“The documentary includes footage of Fauci at various points in his career, starting in 1984 and extending to the present, describing his work in his own words,” says producer, Ken McCarthy. “This is how Anthony Fauci built his career, credibility, and political base.”

McCarthy studied neuroscience at Princeton University in the late 1970s under Bart Hoebel, a pioneer in the study of sugar addiction. McCarthy is considered a pioneer, himself, in the field of internet marketing. A Time Magazine article credits Ken McCarthy’s insights into click-through tracking as a key factor in the commercialization of the World Wide Web.

Such marketing expertise makes McCarthy keenly aware of the true motivations behind mandating a COVID-19 vaccine.

“You have to understand, the vaccine business is fantastic,” he jokingly states in a interview on the The Finding Genius podcast. “Government mandated means [vaccines] have no marketing costs. Universal? Most markets are niche, even big markets. I can’t sell hair curlers to bald men; but [they] can dictate that every child in America get a vaccine….”

“If [they] can dictate that every breathing human being in America gets a vaccine the money becomes mind-boggling.”

In additional to pioneering fundamental elements of the commercial Internet, McCarthy has also been a pioneer of independent online journalism.

“In 1995, I organized and hosted the first conference on the subject of web-based reporting for local news markets,” he explains. “In 1997, as a demonstration of the potential of the medium, I produced what is still the most detailed documentation of an election fraud – the 1997 San Francisco 49er Stadium Bond Initiative – that appears in any format.”

And now he has compiled a detailed documentary showing how Anthony Fauci sold the HIV/AIDS scare in the 1980s, and is doing so again in 2020 with a brand new set of acronyms.

Kary Mullis

Kary Mullis full interview: 

For another look at our new idols (Fauci et al). Here’s some help. 

Kary Mullis in pink t-shirt, Nobel Prize winner, Chemistry, 1993, full interview, 1996. Listen to him in conversation interviewed.

Listen to him describe the reality of AIDS diagnosis and “treatment”.

How many, millions (?) of perfectly healthy people were diagnosed because of a detected virus, then “treated” with an old (and banned) chemotherapy drug, “AZT”, which, doctors directed them to take until they died, sometimes for years.

Parallels to today are disturbing. Same players too. Same playbook. Larger scope. 

Yeah, geniuses today, you see geniuses everywhere today, they call Mullis “bizzarre”, “conspiracy theorist”…

Idiocy, Magical Thinking, Corruption, and TDS

The idea that we can end respiratory illness with vaccines or masks or distancing is, very simply, idiocy.

If a vaccine reduced the effect of some virus, then another virus will take its place in human respiratory illness. To believe otherwise is magical thinking.

Idiocy and magical thinking are the basic narrative premises of “Covid 19”.

The other factor at work is the engine of the apparatus. The engine is simple (though on enormous scale) corruption.

There’s another essential factor.

Corruption, idiocy, and magical thinking are not enough. There must be some other factor that suppresses normal human reason, that otherwise would resist, oppose, and call out corruption, idiocy, and magical thinking.

So there is this other factor, the role of which is to suppress normal human reason. This factor, I suggest, is Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) which was cultivated systematically for 5 years and has profound effect over much of the US and far beyond the US, throughout large parts of Europe and Latin America for example.


There’s a simple answer.

How can all previous frameworks of reason, evidence, and caution be dumped into the landfill?

How can principles of medicine like “first do no harm” be set ablaze, incinerated?

How can disease projection models be so wildly inaccurate, while those running the show are still believed?

How can those calling the shots demonstrate zero concern for the effects of their policy apparatus while maintaining their interest in nothing but their fanatical mission to inject every person on earth with their products, repeatedly?

How can the idea of a RUSH TO INJECT every person on earth be taken as a commitment to reason and science? CAUTION thrown to the wind. Surrender to the MANIC RUSH. How is that consistent with principles of science, testing, evidence, and public health, and humanitarianism?

How is it that this is being PUSHED? And how is it that it’s being followed?

The answers are EASY:

  1. The people PUSHING it are psychotic mother fuckers. And corrupt scumbags.
  2. The people following it were born yesterday. They hear no evil. See no evil. Corruption is inconceivable to them. They’ve been so sheltered, living on fantasy island 🏝 where everyone’s good and the wealthy and powerful are like mommy and daddy carefully planning for good management and the safety and care of everyone. They don’t know what corruption is. It doesn’t look like anything to them. They can’t see it. Even when, or especially when, it’s right out in the open, and pervasive.

Not Even, as it’s injected right into their arm:

Anthony Fauci: 40 Years of Lies From AZT to Remdesivir

 Oct 27, 2020  312

As the planet’s “Virus Tsar” since 1984, he has spread misinformation and ignored critical questions. The consequences could hardly be more fatal.

https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/27/anthony-fauci-40-years-of-lies-from-azt-to-remdesivir/

Why are doctors so obedient?

It’s not just doctors. It’s people. And, apparently, education.

James Spione writes:

Martin Bassani
Precisely correct!

But the degree, the depth of the inability, the pervasiveness of the acceptance of the framing, and the effect of that, it does raise a doubt, some serious questions about what we thought it meant to be smart, and how smart people are, what it meant to us and to them, what it meant or means, to those who think themselves smart

Martin Bassani
I haven’t discerned any particular patterns but one thing does stands out. The most moronic responses come with certitude which is often related to the number years of of schooling. Schooling, in general, is the number one cause of killing off our natural capacity for critical thinking. 


yes. It seems true among people I know. The more education, the more absolutely impervious people are to reason

Juniper Kozlowski
Martin Bassani oh man is this ever true around me also. Thinking i could speak about this whole thing to some brilliant PHD’s who teach latin and greek at a big college nearby was a big mistake. they recoiled in horror and thought i was a trump supporter.


It could be connected to their belief that their advanced education has VALIDATED them. Which means they felt deeply inadequate before their validation. And doubts about official narratives — support of which makes them feel SELECTED and therefore reinforces their validation — your doubts are a threat they can’t tolerate. They’d end up invalidated and inadequate. 

Does advanced education instill feelings of inadequacy, or do people lacking confidence migrate toward specialized advanced education?

Peter Colt
BINGO
That’s exactly it, very well put; they call me a ‘conspiracy theorist’ and write articles saying that people like me have inadequacy/inferiority ‘issues’ that we deal with by believing that we’re in a select group of people with secret knowledge, when in reality they’re projecting their own emotions onto us. They have convinced themselves that they are part of a well educated elite, too intelligent to possibly have been hoodwinked by a corrupt system, yet their confidence in their elite status is actually very shaky, therefore they get defensive when anything challenges their opinion of themselves.

What’s the result of this?

Anthony Fauci smirked at Trump,

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8136953/Dr-Anthony-Fauci-smirks-Trump-coronavirus-press-conference.html

Therefore:

  1. Fauci is the object of greatest admiration, adulation.
  2. He’s IDOLIZED.
  3. Everything he says is true.
  4. Everything he says is believed.
  5. Every pronouncement he makes is obeyed.
  6. Obedience to Fauci is made into a sign of moral righteousness
  7. All evaluation of Fauci’s 4 decades long record of service to pharmaceutical corporations that are convicted criminal organizations = heresy
  8. heretics are EXCOMMUNICATED

Regarding item 7 above:

https://www.facebook.com/1104057641/videos/10218567881723966/

From the video:

I don’t think we can trust vaccine companies. I think anyone who trusts the vaccine companies is not looking at the history or the corrupt institutional cultures that are pervasive in all of these companies. The four companies that make all of America’s mandated vaccines, Novi, Merck, Vaxil, and Pfizer, are all convicted serial felons. These are criminal enterprises. Those four companies, since 2009, in other words over the last decade, have spent almost 35 Billion dollars in criminal penalties and damages, for defrauding regulators, for falsifying science, for lying to doctors, uh, and for killing hundreds of thousands of Americans with products they knew were lethal.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Under the Vaccine Act that was passed in 1986 in our country, vaccine makers, for mandated vaccines, have no liability for injuring people. You cannot sue them for vaccine injury. And the new COVID vaccines have an even greater level of protection, as you know “pandemic countermeasures” under the Prep Act, under the CARES Act, they are completely immune from, have blanket immunity. You can’t sue ’em. So they can never get caught. No matter how negligent they are. No matter how many people they mangle, they injure, they kill. No matter how toxic the ingredients. No matter how grevious your injury. You cannot sue that company. There’s no discovery. There’s no depositions. There’s no incentive for them to make a safe product.

Robert F Kennedy Jr.

This is what thinking looks like, with backbone, with establishment of principle, with clear perception (of for example, the environment (corruption), with high quality questions. First of all, with the formulation of RELEVANT questions:

31 reasons why I won’t take the vaccine

https://www.nexusnewsfeed.com/article/health-healing/31-reasons-why-i-won-t-take-the-vaccine/

Another paper, highly recommend:

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/22/25

Messianic Mad Men, Medicine, and the Media War on Empirical Reality: Discourse Analysis of Mainstream Covid-19 Propaganda

Daniel Broudy1 and Darwin K. Hoop2

1Professor of Applied Linguistics, Okinawa Christian University, Nishihara-cho, Okinawa, 903-0207, Japan, dbroudy@ocjc.ac.jp ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-6914

2Independent Scholar and Researcher, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, darwin.hoop@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

This article critically examines the emerging global war on pathogens mimicking the Global War on Terror (GWOT). We draw upon the history of recent wars and the fear-driven narratives aimed at nudging the public toward uncritical acceptance of the new emerging social and economic global order. We adopt Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky’s ‘Propaganda Model’ to describe how mainstream media perform in manufacturing consent to policies that tighten control overpopulations and degrade rights, agency, and sovereignty. Here we consider the efforts of globalist political actors who seek to co-opt or influence political institutions around the world and position themselves as unelected rulers of an emerging authoritarian order. We argue that agenda-setting media are predisposed to serve elite interests that shape news coverage, bound public debate, and obscure new forms of warfare behind the smokescreen of a manufactured Global War on Pathogens (GWOP). We introduce critical analysis and alternative perspectives, largely marginalized by the mainstream, on the hidden conflicts of interest involved in the demands for full social compliance.

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/22/25

Keywords:

pandemic, Covid-19, vaccination, experiment,mainstream media, integration propaganda, agitation propaganda, Propaganda Model, narrative control, GWOT, GWOP,fear, perception management

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/22/25

Straw Man Arguments

“Where it falls apart for me is the idea that this new coronavirus does not exist and that everybody with access to microscopes who is capable of identifying viral groups is in on it.”

That’s a straw man argument. No sensible person says that human respiratory illness does not exist. The real issue is that the C19 narrative is premised precisely on the ideas:

  1. that human respiratory illness does NOT exist typically
  2. that if a virus (Sar-cov-2) can be beaten by vaccine, that another virus will NOT take its place in human respiratory illness
  3. that, admitting (2), another virus (variant) will take its place after all, so therefore you need another vaccine, and another, and another, and another… forever.

The premise of C19 is utterly absurd, devoid of actual science, and is nothing more than the greatest extortion scheme ever played, by far.

by the way, “identifying viral groups with a microscope” or by any other means, like by Drosten PCR, does literally nothing to demonstrate that the detected viruses are causing “covid disease”.So “being in on it” is a useless concept.

The presence of respiratory disease also does precisely nothing to demonstrate the presence of “covid disease”. See item (1) again: human respiratory illness exists. C19 narrative is premised absurdly on the idea that every respiratory illness is covid, and that respiratory illness is novel.

Stuart Davies
Good points, Rob. Interesting that it hits the same subject that I just responded to in an email to a friend, here’s what I just said to him:

I’m not saying there is no coronavirus at all. In fact, there are all kinds of coronaviruses in circulation every year, they are among the 200 + different viruses which can cause the common cold. What I am saying is the specific coronavirus (SA-CoV-2, more commonly called covid 19) blamed for the pandemic is NOT PATHOGENIC in humans according to the one study that has been done which the CDC cites as evidence it is pathogenic. I have sent you my analysis on that several times, don’t you remember it? So, they apparently did study a virus they call covid 19, but they also showed that it cannot make humans sick…but you have to read the study yourself to see that, rather than simply believe the CDC’s interpretation of what it says.

I am saying there is no pandemic, it is a flat out fabrication. It is based on fraudulent statistics derived from illegal changes in disease reporting and procedures for reporting cause of deaths. I sent you a bunch of that documentation more than once before also, and can send that again if you like. Here is another video I saw yesterday, with a doc from Montana who gives a very good explanation on the issue of ’cause of death’ reporting on death certificates: 

Here is an excerpt from an article from a few years back before all of this covid BS came along:

“Influenza-like illness (ILI) is a substantial clinical and economic burden on patients, healthcare providers, and the broader healthcare system. Depending on the pathogenicity of the viral strain and the effectiveness of the vaccine, there are typically between nine million and 36 million influenza cases annually in the United States, resulting in 140,000 to 710,000 hospitalizations.1 However, influenza represents a small percentage of the hundreds of millions of upper respiratory infections (URIs) that occur annually in the U.S. alone.2,3 This broader group of infections accounts for more healthcare provider visits than any other acute condition annually and results in almost 50 million lost days from work and school.

ILI is a condition that presents with fever, cough, sore throat, shivering, chills, malaise, body aches, and/or nausea and is often associated with rapid onset. Frequent causes include the common cold and influenza, but ILI can be caused by more than 20 different viral and bacterial pathogens with overlapping and non-specific presentations. This complicates accurate, timely diagnosis.

More than 200 subtypes of viruses cause the common cold. While rhinoviruses represent a plurality of causative pathogens (30 percent to 50 percent of colds), other infectious agents are also implicated: coronaviruses (10 percent to 15 percent); influenza viruses (five percent to 15 percent); respiratory syncytial viruses (RSV, ~10 percent); parainfluenza viruses (PIV, ~ five percent); enteroviruses (< five percent); and human metapneumovirus (hMPV).7 Additionally, the cause of 20 percent to 30 percent of common colds is unknown. Given the similar presentation associated with these viruses, it is not possible to establish the causative pathogen based on clinical diagnosis alone.

For instance, the differential for RSV in adults includes influenza and PIV. In infants it is even broader, including influenza, PIV, hMPV, rhinovirus, coronavirus, human bocavirus, and adenovirus. Studies have shown that RSV infection develops annually in three percent to seven percent of healthy older adults, may contribute to excess wintertime mortality previously attributed to influenza, and is a leading cause of hospitalization in young patients.8-10

Even the diagnosis of influenza can be confounded by the overlapping syndromes of ILI. A meta-analysis that reviewed the precision and accuracy of symptoms and signs of flu in adult patients over 60 years of age concluded that “clinical findings identify patients with influenza-like illness but are not particularly useful for confirming or excluding the diagnosis of influenza.”11

ILI poses a significant risk in immunosuppressed and immunocompromised patients… Rapid, accurate diagnosis is an important component of patient management in these populations as it helps direct appropriate antiviral and/or antibiotic therapy and can inform decisions about timing of transplant or additional therapy.15 Current practice guidelines support testing for a wide range of suspected respiratory pathogens in these high-risk populations.” 

https://www.mlo-online.com/continuing-education/article/13009287/confronting-the-challenges-of-influenzalike-illness

Note what they said towards the end there: “Rapid, accurate diagnosis is an important component of patient management… Current practice guidelines support testing for a wide range of suspected respiratory pathogens in these high-risk populations “

And what happened this last year? They kept people who were sick out of the hospital, denied treatment until they were really sick, then MISDIAGNOSED them with a completely FRAUDULENT ‘covid PCR’ test! Once they had their false ‘positive’ for ‘covid 19’ (which once again has been proven to be NON PATHOGENIC in humans) they did not follow the standard medical diagnostic procedure from just a few years before: “Current practice guidelines support testing for a wide range of suspected respiratory pathogens…”

Stuart Davies continues:

“The state’s Public Health Laboratory in Rocky Hill misdiagnosed 90 people as COVID-19-positive during the past month, a mishap that likely led healthy nursing home residents to be housed with infected patients, state health officials acknowledged Monday. Department of Public Health Commissioner Deirdre Gifford and the public health laboratory’s director, Dr. Jafar Razeq, also could not say whether the four private labs assisting the state with COVID-19 tests had similar problems with false positives. But they said the reason for the misdiagnosis lies with the test’s manufacturer, and not with the state lab.” https://ctmirror.org/2020/07/20/connecticut-misdiagnosed-elderly-patients-as-covid-19-positive/

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.16.20067884v3.full.pdf

https://www.mprnews.org/story/2020/04/07/covid19-death-certificate-change-stirs-controversy

And especially this:

https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_c39029cd980642e48797cdb2ef965972.pdf

Also explained in this video: https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/investigatethecdc

“Date: 13 January 2021 WHO-identifier: 2020/5, version 2 Target audience: laboratory professionals and users of IVDs. Purpose of this notice: clarify information previously provided by WHO. This notice supersedes WHO Information Notice for In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device (IVD) Users 2020/05 version 1, issued 14 December 2020. Description of the problem: WHO requests users to follow the instructions for use (IFU) when interpreting results for specimens tested using PCR methodology. Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer. WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology. WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity. Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.” https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05

“SUMMARY CATALOGUE OF ERRORS FOUND IN THE PAPER The Corman-Drosten paper contains the following specific errors:

1. There exists no specified reason to use these extremely high concentrations of primers in this protocol. The described concentrations lead to increased nonspecific bindings and PCR product amplifications, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

2. Six unspecified wobbly positions will introduce an enormous variability in the real world laboratory implementations of this test; the confusing nonspecific description in the Corman-Drosten paper is not suitable as a Standard Operational Protocol making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

3. The test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments. Therefore, the test cannot be used as a diagnostic for intact (infectious) viruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus and make inferences about the presence of an infection.

4. A difference of 10° C with respect to the annealing temperature Tm for primer pair1 (RdRp_SARSr_F and RdRp_SARSr_R) also makes the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

5. A severe error is the omission of a Ct value at which a sample is considered positive and negative. This Ct value is also not found in follow-up submissions making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

6. The PCR products have not been validated at the molecular level. This fact makes the protocol useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

7. The PCR test contains neither a unique positive control to evaluate its specificity for SARS-CoV-2 nor a negative control to exclude the presence of other coronaviruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

8. The test design in the Corman-Drosten paper is so vague and flawed that one can go in dozens of different directions; nothing is standardized and there is no SOP. This highly questions the scientific validity of the test and makes it unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

9. Most likely, the Corman-Drosten paper was not peer-reviewed making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

10. We find severe conflicts of interest for at least four authors, in addition to the fact that two of the authors of the Corman-Drosten paper (Christian Drosten and Chantal Reusken) are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance. A conflict of interest was added on July 29 2020 (Olfert Landt is CEO of TIB-Molbiol; Marco Kaiser is senior researcher at GenExpress and serves as scientific advisor for TIB-Molbiol), that was not declared in the original version (and still is missing in the PubMed version); TIB-Molbiol is the company which was “the first” to produce PCR kits (Light Mix) based on the protocol published in the Corman-Drosten manuscript, and according to their own words, they distributed these PCR-test kits before the publication was even submitted [20]; further, Victor Corman & Christian Drosten failed to mention their second affiliation: the commercial test laboratory “Labor Berlin”. Both are responsible for the virus diagnostics there [21] and the company operates in the realm of real time PCR-testing.”

Yeah:

The whole thing STINKS

Rabbi Chananya Weissman https://www.nexusnewsfeed.com/article/health-healing/31-reasons-why-i-won-t-take-the-vaccine/

And what’s needed is a disinfectant:

Brandeis made his famous statement that “sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants” in a 1913 Harper’s Weekly article, entitled “What Publicity Can Do.” But it was an image that had been in his mind for decades. Twenty years earlier, in a letter to his fiance, Brandeis had expressed an interest in writing a “a sort of companion piece” to his influential article on “The Right to Privacy,” but this time he would focus on “The Duty of Publicity.” He had been thinking, he wrote, “about the wickedness of people shielding wrongdoers & passing them off (or at least allowing them to pass themselves off) as honest men.” He then proposed a remedy:

https://sunlightfoundation.com/2009/05/26/brandeis-and-the-history-of-transparency/

If the broad light of day could be let in upon men’s actions, it would purify them as the sun disinfects.

Louis Brandeis
Categories
Uncategorized

I have near zero people in my circle of family and friends who admire Trump

Kathi Roussel
I’m in western NY, and I have to say, that the majority of people I’m acquainted with are all pro vax, pro mask, pro lockdown, and so on. These are people in the arts who I’d always imagined were free thinkers and non conformists. It’s been shocking to discover that the quite opposite is true. It’s difficult coming to terms with the fact that I no longer have a community. I think so many of us are experiencing the same thing. I often wish my FB friends lived nearby. I imagine we’d get a good deal more accomplished..

Antoine Jacques
The story of what happened to that class – some call the “cultural creatives,” a label I don’t really like – has to be written. I think it has something to do with all the “niceness” that all these therapeutic models – New Age, ersatz spirituality, along with rampant anti-depressant use – and lots of NPR – really impeded their ability to respond adequately to the monstrous criminality of the overclass. They’ve stopped questioning authority, and have become the most compliant. That niceness is what fuels the mask wearing – Do it for others! – and the aggressive virtue signaling. This is where the no bullshit attitude of the working class, mainly small business people (since an industrial proletariat does not exist here), makes it much easier to see thru the scams that the elite run. They are more likely to have an innate distrust of institutions that the liberal class, that artists belong to, reveres. The “Alt-Right” now has the edge that used to be the left’s.

Elaine Martin
There was some messaging ahead of this. I had a former student who was really on me about flu shots.

I had explained how I used oregano oil first sign of a flu, usually a sore throat. It always works for me, but she said it was unscientific, and I was still an asymptomatic carrier (and irresponsible). That was in 2014 or 2015. She was an honor student, and she later went on to be an archivist at John Hopkins.

I realized that many of my former students were campaigning for science, and casting aspersions at those who were “new agey” or not as educated as they were or too right or conservative. After the Me Too rallies (rah rah Hillary and the DNC) there was a science rally in 2018 here in LA. It was kind of a self-righteous gathering of science supporters, very liberal and kind of snarky. I have to say, though I identified with liberals and progressives up until that time, I was completely on the outs with the standard medical practices with pharma drugs and shots. I was also noticing how unattractive these people were becoming: self-congratulatory and looking down their noses at the “less sophisticated” folks who didn’t agree about some science-y things and vaxxing. I hated the divisiveness and arrogance. I didn’t like Trump, but when Fauci sort of sneered or whatever and upstaged him a year ago, I thought, “What a freakin’ putz!” Then I researched AIDS, and it all came together for me. Thank God. I didn’t want to be in that cancel culture club anymore.

https://zachfresa.com/2021/03/29/corruption-loves-science/

Malu Ribeiro
I think it’d be easier to get your meaning with “Fauci loves fucking with science” … but sure!

  • Arik Oudemans
    Malu Ribeiro, Doesn’t the one mean ‘tampering’ and the other ‘destroying’?
  • ActiveMalu Ribeiro
    Arik Oudemans, No sorry, they both read as exclamations, the 2nd is missing a preposition .. but it’s just a technicality, I shouldn’t have written anything … But I can say something like “I love fucking beer!” … I’m not saying I love screwing beer, it means I love (adjective) beer … 😃 lol Sorry, again, I should keep it to myself … I’m not a gramma cop normally … 😃 lol 
  • Arik Oudemans
    Malu Ribeiro, it’s nice to get it right. How about this.
    1. you’re fucking with my mind.
    2. you’re fucking my mind. (this one sounds more destructive – similar to ‘fucking up my mind’.)
  • Rob Snyder
    Malu Ribeiro, whole books are written just only on the myriad uses of this fucking word.

    After studying those books, fucking ALL of them, I wrote this the way I wrote it.

    After you think about it, a-fucking-gain, you’ll notice it’s on target 🎯 🤣

    After 40 years of Anthony Fauci fucking with it, science is fucked.

    I could say, After 40 years of Anthony Fauci fucking with it, science is fucked UP.

    But that’s weaker.

    Fauci loves fucking science.

    And now science is fucked up beyond all repair
  • Stuart Cleary
    Rob Snyder Hit the nail on the head 🙂
  • Malu Ribeiro
    Rob Snyder You proved my fucking point! 😃 lol
  • Malu Ribeiro
    Arik No, they fucking mean different things, not an issue of fucking intensity … 😃 lol
  • Rob Snyder
    Malu Ribeiro did I prove your point? Fauci fucked your point. 

    I fucking LOVE your point. 
    Anthony Fauci loves FUCKING your point. 

    Your point is fucked. 

    Community Standards are Violated

Brigid Whipple

3h  · 

“The “woke” lack courage and therefore choose peaceful slavery”.-

–JP Sears

Only thing I disagree with is much of them are young, and don’t know (yet) how much they are bought (the woke). Eventually they’ll fight back (I hope).The middle aged ones, and older ones who buy the dominant narrative?Mostly rhetorical. Though I hold hope for them too.

3h 

Arne Sundt
The “woke” lack courage and therefore choose peaceful slavery”To me that completely misses the point. I never did get woke, but I did finally see wtf is going on. The woke are just watching a film of carefully curated narrative flickering by on the big screen of complete bullshit. But this one never goes clack clack clack at the end as the lights come up and the curtain closes, they won’t ever see the stained and faded velour and the sticky fucken debris strewn floors

  • Brigid Whipple
    They choose the show. With the stained velour, the sticky floors, and the rat shit at their feet. Which is even a much better show than the real shit show we’re living.
  • Arne Sundt
    I don’t think they choose anything. Lacking in discernment. If you never leave a primitive society, you don’t have any idea what civilization looks like. The flood of information chooses what they think for them.
  • Arne Sundt
    What we should really do is give everyone in the US under 40 a passport and fund them to travel for a year. They’d all come back and say fuck this place, we need to fix it. 
  • Brigid Whipple
    I hold two feelings, the feeling/idea that we do choose, and the idea/feeling that we don’t choose. I think we do choose, much of the time, even knowing how much manipulation is out there on our beings, there is always life speaking, on some level. Given that, no,…forget that, we know.
  • Brigid Whipple
    I had a talk with a 17 year old yesterday and today that, was very illuminating.
  • Arne Sundt
    Most of the beaten down are too tired to dig up that choose part. It’s easier to just be part of the conforming GP. Once you start thinking, shit stays depressing.
  • Brigid Whipple
    Arne Sundt for some part I agree. Except for I grew up in the underclass of the underclass. I was the kid who other kids threw pennies at. I was the made fun of bullied poor girl at school. I find thinking to be the least depressing thing.I have many things to say about poverty in western society otherwise.

INFANTILISM As A Basis For Trusting The Authorities.

An essay by Tim Foyle

https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/12/on-the-psychology-of-the-conspiracy-denier/

Excerpts:

“While the immature psyche no longer depends on parents for its well-being, the powerful and motivating core tenet I have described remains intact: unchallenged, unconsidered and undeveloped. And, in a world in which stability and security are distant memories, these survival instincts, rather than being well-honed, considered, relevant, discerning and up to date, remain, quite literally, those of a baby. Trust is placed in the biggest, loudest, most present and undeniable force around, because instinct decrees that survival depends on it.”

———-

“And, in this great ‘world nursery’, the most omnipresent force is the network of institutions which consistently project an unearned image of power, calm, expertise, concern and stability.In my view, this is how conspiracy deniers are able to cling to and aggressively defend the utterly illogical fantasy that somehow – above a certain undefined level of the societal hierarchy – corruption, deceit, malevolence and narcissism mysteriously evaporate. That, contrary to the maxim, the more power a person has, the more integrity they will inevitably exhibit. These poor deluded souls essentially believe that where personal experience and prior knowledge cannot fill in the gaps in their worldview – in short, where there is a barred door – mummy and daddy are behind it, working out how best to ensure that their little precious will be comfortable, happy and safe forever.”

———-

“This dangerous delusion may be the central factor placing humanity’s physical security and future in the hands of sociopaths.To anyone in the habit of dismissing people who are questioning, investigative and sceptical as tin foil hat wearing, paranoid, science-denying Trump supporters, the question is: what do you believe in? Where have you placed your faith and why? How is it that while no one trusts governments, you appear to trust nascent global governance organisations without question? How is this rational?”

———-

“This essay has focussed on what I consider to be the deepest psychological driver of conspiracy denial.

There are certainly others, such as the desire to be accepted; the avoidance of knowledge of, and engagement with, the internal and external shadow; the preservation of a positive and righteous self-image: a generalised version of the ‘flying monkey’ phenomenon, in which a self-interested and vicious class protect themselves by coalescing around the bully; the subtle unconscious adoption of the sociopathic worldview (e.g. ‘humanity is the virus’); outrage addiction/superiority complex/status games; a stunted or unambitious intellect that finds validation through maintaining the status quo; the dissociative protective mechanism of imagining that crimes and horrors committed repeatedly within our lifetime are somehow not happening now, not ‘here’; and plain old fashioned laziness and cowardice.

My suggestion is that, to some degree, all of these build on the foundation of the primary cause I’ve outlined here.”

h/t Lena Bloch


Idiocy, Magical Thinking, Corruption, and TDS

The idea that we can end respiratory illness with vaccines or masks or distancing is, very simply, idiocy.

If a vaccine reduced the effect of some virus, then another virus will take its place in human respiratory illness. To believe otherwise is magical thinking.

Idiocy and magical thinking are the basic narrative premises of “Covid 19”.

The other factor at work is the engine of the apparatus. The engine is simple (though on enormous scale) corruption.

But there’s another essential factor.

Corruption, idiocy, and magical thinking are not enough. There must be some other factor that suppresses normal human reason, that otherwise would resist, oppose, and call out corruption, idiocy, and magical thinking.

So there is this other factor, the role of which is to suppress normal human reason. This factor, I suggest, is Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) which was cultivated systematically for 5 years and has profound effect over much of the US and far beyond the US, throughout large parts of Europe and Latin America for example.

https://zachfresa.com/2021/03/28/a-party-of-and-for-extreme-far-right-reactionaries-the-democratic-party
  • Stuart Davies
    On the other hand, those who suffer from Trump Adulation Syndrome (TAD) share a few common delusions with those who are afflicted with TDS, along with other symptoms specific to their condition. BOTH conditions have been carefully cultivated. 
    • Rob Snyder
      Stuart, TAD has the effect of continuing support for the general scope of American Republican Party policies. TDS has the same effect (because the Democratic Party has exactly the same policies). But TDS has the additional effect of cementing any remnant opposition to these policies, in a coffin under 12 feet of cement.
    • Stuart Davies
      Ah, but therein you put your finger right on one of the shared delusions, which is the belief that Trump actually opposed these policies, when in fact he was the enabler in chief even as he participated in the scripted narrative which created the illusion of his ‘opposition’ to the ‘pandemic’ agenda.
    • Rob Snyder
      Stuart Davies, I didn’t say that. I said the opposite: “TAD has the effect of continuing support for the general scope of American Republican Party policies.”
    • Stuart Davies
      Okay, I didn’t note that you had said GENERAL REPUBLICAN party policies. But then again, given that you also correctly stated that the Democratic Party has exactly the same policies – even in regard to the ‘pandemic’ agenda (contrary to the media generated illusion) – it is still true that TDS and TAD both reinforce the delusion that Trump opposed those specific policies, right? I would say that burying any remnant opposition to these ‘pandemic’ policies in a coffin under 12 feet of cement is one of the many purposes of the TDS/TAD mind control dichotomy. The “T” in both cases is of course an essential element, which I dub the Trump caricature persona reverse psychology straw man script. We see it in play across the entire sociopolitical spectrum throughout the transnational empire, it has been (and continues to be!) an incredibly effective perception management tool for the puppet masters.
    • Rob Snyder
      Stuart, is anyone motivated by Trump Adulation Syndrome to oppose the C19 narrative and policy apparatus?

      There may be some. Even significant numbers. To precisely that extent, that there are people opposing the C19 narrative and policy because of TAD, TAD is a positive factor in the world.

      TDS on the other hand is probably motivating exactly zero people to oppose C19 narrative and policy while motivating a very large number of people to support it. TDS and the closely related OAS (Obama Adulation Syndrome) have caused enormous numbers of people who formerly would have (and did) oppose US imperial war and annihilation of people who work for a living to instead promote those very things, energetically, with zeal, passion, with fucking derangement. 

      Oddly, TAD has had rather the opposite effect and huge numbers of Trump fans look and sound rather like hippie peaceniks of 50 years ago.

      On the other hand I see absolute zero positive value in TDS.
    • Stuart Davies
      Well, I guess you could say that anything that induces opposition to the Co. vid agenda is a positive thing. But perhaps we should stop and consider the full implications of what it means when the puppet masters fund, infiltrate, and manipulate organizations and movements – even those we might deem to be righteous ones – across the sociopolitical spectrum.

      Consider, in this case, some of the implications of the FBI/CIA psyop known as “Q” which actively ENCOURAGED opposition to the pandemic agenda among Trump supporters. Look at that fact when it is further illuminated by some of the specific details laid out in that famous Rockefeller Foundation “Lockstep” scenario, wherein they not only anticipated the entire ‘pandemic’ and the lockdown measures which contradicted well established medical science, but also anticipated the push back against those lock down measures. They WROTE that into their fucking script ten years before they made it happen, brother
    • Wendy Broffman-Jackson
      I have loved ones who remain enamored with Trump and they will latch on to ANY explanation to explain away evidence of Trump being just another enabler of the agenda.

      And when asked for proof that these explanations hold weight, they will fall back on their FEELING that Trump is a good guy or fall back on something he said, but did not do because he was stopped from doing it by the deep state. This is similar to my friends who continue to excuse Obama for never following up on his promises and blame the republican party. Yes, both TAD and and TDA result in similar delusions and I am sure the division between those who oppose and those who accept the covid narrative was in the script long ago.
    • Stuart Davies
      Good point about how TAD relates to die hard O’Bomber apologists, Wendy, I’ve noticed the same thing.
    • Rob Snyder
      I have near zero people in my circle of family and friends who admire Trump. 

      90% of people I’ve known in person in 54 years are full time believers in Clinton, Obama, Biden… 

      5% are Republican voters 

      5% care about none of the above.

      Over the last 10 years, those in the first group, the 90%, I’ve noticed have nothing worthwhile to say about any policy positions of the US establishment. They enthusiastically support all of its most heinous crimes.

      But among the second and third groups, the remaining 5% and 5%, over the last 10 years in my experience, they tend to have quite a lot to say that’s meaningful and useful, in opposition to US policy. This is true even for those few affected by Trump Adulation Syndrome (TAD).

      There is a difference that comes from the merits of one’s position when being duped.

      For example, if I’m suffering from OAS and TDS (Obama Adulation and Trump Derangement) and so I believe in Fauci’s prescription to turn everything into gulag life, then my beliefs are devoid of merit and I’m getting duped. (-2)

      On the other hand if I suffer from TAD (Trump Adulation) and so am inspired to take a position against gulag life, then I’m taking a position that has merit and I’m getting duped by the idea that Trump shares my position. (0)

      The latter is a 0.

      The former is a -2

      But I’d add 1 to the latter and subtract 1 from the former (for merit).

      So the latter is (+1). The former is (-3)
    • Wendy Broffman-Jackson
      Rob Snyder I understand what you are saying and I agree somewhat. But look at the Q phenomenon…many of those who believe/believed could be made to do or follow some order if it was handed down by the secret patriot group that supposedly had infiltrated the deep state….as we mentioned, the push back was mentioned in the Lock Step plan…so as is typical of the way these rulers work, if they anticipate it, then they want to control it…therefore Q.
    • Wendy Broffman-Jackson
      moreover, they are able to adjust in real time since they control narratives, the media, the military and the weapons and teh experiment itself
    • Rob Snyder
      Wendy Broffman-Jackson yes. I’m aware of that. I’m just talking about the effect of those facts, in people I know
    • Wendy Broffman-Jackson
      Rob Snyder I heard a short sci fi story read over the radio in the 1970s on a program called Hour 25 hosted by Mike Hodel and later, after Hodel died of cancer, by Harlan Ellison. In the story (wish I could remember the author or name of story) a man sees a shimmer and a vision of a reality that differs from that which he believes in…that the world is ordered in the way it always has been. He investigates and discovers that as he pierces each veil of illusion, each layer reveals a situation much worse. If memory serves he discovers the rulers have been able to create so many layers of lies and illusions that all they have to keep up is the illusion. In reality the air is polluted, the streets are filthy and people are starving. At least that’s how I remember it. DO you happen to know that story?
    • Rob Snyder
      Mark L Stewart might know that Ellison story
    • Stuart Davies
      Rob, regarding your comment that “on the other hand if I suffer from TAD and so am inspired to take a position against gulag life, then I’m taking a position that has merit and I’m getting duped by the idea that Trump shares my position”, you seem to miss my real point.

      The illusionary idea that “Trump shares my position” isn’t really what I was getting at. I was asking you to consider the implications of the puppet masters actively engaging in a psyop to induce a particular segment of the population to disbelieve at least certain aspects of their ‘pandemic’ narrative. Consider that in the light of their “Lockstep” scenario where they wrote the lockdowns and pushback to the lockdowns into their script.There are numerous other aspects to they way in which pro and anti Trump foot soldiers have been manipulated over the past four or five years. For example, look at how they used the pro Trump ‘extras’ that they used ‘Q’ to assist in bringing to the set used for their staged ‘insurrection’. That is just one way they have used those TAD afflicted individuals to further their propaganda and policy agenda. Somehow, I feel certain that they are not anywhere near done with their fomented pushback script.Look at how they used their Trump caricature persona’s mouth, the media, infiltrated (BLM) or outright fabricated (‘antifa’) organizations, and both pro and anti Trump foot soldiers again and again from the time of his election campaign rallies through the ‘antifa riots’ to pull off their divide and conquer game plan.
    • Rob Snyder
      Stuart Davies yes. I see. We live in an empire of total corruption. Everything is corrupted. Has to be accounted for somehow. Who knows how. Discernment has to be encouraged in everyone though. Nothing is possible without it. And the merit or anti-merit of particular positions, no matter who they’re associated with or who promotes them. 
    • Stuart Davies
      As usual, they play all ends against the middle. Encouraging discernment in everyone is definitely the essential first step, but even there the deck seems hopelessly stacked against us. It doesn’t encourage a realist to optimism, does it?
    • Rob Snyder
      Stuart Davies you’re right it doesn’t. So far the zombie-like behavior of most people sort of drains hope
    • Arik Oudemans
      Let’s not be hopeful. It effects our spirituality negatively. Strong spirituality on the other hand is magnetic. It might help break the spell people are under. One person at a time. (not meaning to be overly esoteric here or something, but if the charisma is in my court, i’ve noticed people are very easily explained the whole thing in half an hour or so. Working through the puzzles one by one. The rapport is crucial though. Must be of the highest order. Not complaining, not hoping, not being small, but being clear and ‘accepting’ even. Without judgement even. etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCVvZ62gh7YTao Te Ching, The Book Of The Way by Lao Tzu Audiobook LVRYOUTUBE.COM Tao Te Ching, The Book Of The Way by Lao Tzu Audiobook LVR Tao Te Ching, The Book Of The Way by Lao Tzu Audiobook LVR
    • Arik Oudemans
      so they win, but at least we know and are no longer condemned to be isolated from the people around us.
    • Arik Oudemans
      As far as what role is planned for those critical. We know they want to get rid of governments in favour of governance. In short order. So their plan benefits from the population of the world experiencing STRONG distrust in their governments. Not a prediction. More like in a game of go, where everything can get turned around on you. Or perhaps checkers. 
  • Martin Bassani
    Manipulations are heavier than most of us can imagine. If unity of people is a threat to them than all division is good for them. We should not be surprised that they are funding all sorts of operations, groups and personalities which end up dividing us along utterly BS lines. Any time I see anyone demonizing a fellow wage slave I know this is a result of a deliberate effort. Once you realize what is happening, you don’t need to look far for the evidence, . If the end result is support of the either of the two political corporations you know they have achieved their desired effect. =====================On FB until May 31st. https://vk.com/martinbassaniMartin BassaniVK.COMMartin BassaniMartin Bassani
  • Arik Oudemans
    correct

Case Roole

 · 1h  · 

How to see the relation between America and Europe?

1. Due to organisational and linguistic constraints until recently European countries had a military. Today, with year on year massive military “exercises”, these militaries are so fully integrated into the American army that there is no point seeing them as anything other than auxiliaries. They are definitely not “allies”.

2. Again, due to organisational and linguistic constraints, until recently it was beneficial for America to have a solid industrial base in Europe. This is why business oriented parties were so strong in Europe. It is also the basis of the original division of sovereignty with the EU: America determines international policy and runs the military, but Europeans can run their own trade policies. As organisational and linguistic constraints have been overcome, America has no reneged on that arrangement and taken sovereignty over trade in the EU.

3. With tight surveillance of the European population through Faebook and Google, globalized companies acceptin America as their sovereign,

4. With nationalistic parties (full sovereignty including the military) and business parties (America determines international policy, but the country determines trade) now side-lined, there are two forms of political niches left in Europa.

a.) Freedom, Democracy & Human Rights. Such parties typically stand for surveillance, prohibition on demonstrations, censorship, propaganda, and corrupt NGOs at home, while simultaneously supporting each and every American imperial aggression.

b.) Green Parties. Their basic ideology is that unless there is total control over humanity we will all perish due to “climate change”. The most promising path to total control over humanity they see is global conquest by the American military.These two brands of European ideology are most in line with taking totalitarian control over the European population and American imperialism, so they get all the support they like.

As political parties these two are merely shallow cheerleaders for American totalitarian control over the European population and American aggression against the last sovereign states on Earth.

Essential. A friend writes:

“It’s interesting, people on the so-called right have been sounding more and more like peacenik hippies lately. They’ve taken the anti-war position, they’re promoting personal freedoms, anti-corporatism, self-sufficiency, organic local food – even farmers markets have become a ‘dogwhistle’ for nationalism. Meanwhile the so called left have gone full-on authoritarian, pro-CIA police-state globalist empire, rat on your neighbours, single-family houses are elitist and should be demolished to make way for big developments, we should all eat lab-grown manufactured ‘sustainable’ food instead of labour intensive real food, they’ve unwittingly become completely appallingly racist….. Since the Bush era the propaganda target has shifted from the right to the Liberal/left. Then (since Bernie became a threat) they’ve gone all-in to try to destroy the credibility of the populist (for the people) message. The biggest ruse of them all was to convince sh!tlibs that populism is a nefarious force.

When left to their own devices people aren’t that different, Both ‘sides’ can easily be coached into extreme positions by manipulative media

Yes, I’m arguing that the so-called ‘Liberal’ left have been tricked en-masse into taking up extremist, completely insane positions.”

Categories
Uncategorized

Corruption Loves Science

While you “fucking LOVE science”…

Fauci loves FUCKING science.

Covid

https://youtu.be/QAHi3lX3oGM

This is testimony about the medical professions’ systematic withholding of any treatment at all for respiratory patients who receive a positive Covid test, for 2 weeks until they then arrive at a hospital.

If that doesn’t strike you as abnormal, and even on the surface, as stupid, then do a self sanity check now. For those who’ve recognized this systematic failure/refusal to treat patients, the testimony here paints a clear and extremely disturbing picture. The picture happens to be consistent with decades worth of similar malfeasance surrounding Anthony Fauci, NIH, et al.

Corruption

Anyone who says what Fauci/Gates says but who is not a celebrity and not an intently focused criminal schemer and not integrally networked together with other like-minded criminal schemers, would be seen as nothing other than a psychotic douchecan. But put all those together, and a psychotic douchecan is accepted as a god.

Same fraud, same playbook, same criminal scheme, bigger scope this time. 

https://www.globalresearch.ca/fauci-first-fraud-documentary-exposes-decades-old-lies-behind-man-cancelled-thanksgiving/5730282

The film destroys Fauci’s credibility

Duration 1:33:49 Fauci’s First Fraud is a 2020 independent film exposing how Fauci perpetuated misinformation over the AIDS pandemic leading to millions of deaths.“The Nobel Prize winner who discovered HIV, Luc Montagnier, said it does not cause AIDS,” explained producer, Ken McCarthy in an email interview.

“Another Nobel Prize winner, Kary Mullis — the one who invented the HIV PCR test that Fauci used to find ‘infected cases’ among the healthy — called the use of the test for diagnosis of AIDS a fraud.”

Sound familiar?

Watch the film at the link.

Remarkable Parallels Between the AIDS and COVID Scare.

The description for this documentary about the 1980’s AIDS scamdemic reads like the COVID-19 headlines of 2020:

“A deadly new virus is discovered… There’s no treatment or cure… It’s highly contagious… Everyone is a potential victim… The world is at risk from asymptomatic super spreaders… New clusters of cases reported daily…“

Everyone must get tested even though the tests are unreliable… Positive antibody tests are called ‘infections’ and ‘cases’ even when the patient has no symptoms… Every politician gets involved… Media hysteria in high gear… Activists demand salvation from government and Big Pharma…

“Billions of dollars are authorized for fast track drug and vaccine research… Simple, effective remedies are rejected while expensive, dangerous ones are pushed……Presumptive diagnoses… Exaggerated death statistics… Falsified death certificates…”

It would seem that the only significant factor differentiating the AIDS pandemic from the COVID scandal is scale. As McCarthy explains:

“Every single fraud technique being used today to ‘sell’ COVID hysteria was invented in the 1980s and 1990s by Tony Fauci to sell the AIDS fraud.”

The New Normal May Not Be All That New After All

The documentary presents a compilation of interviews, press releases and documents collected from YouTube, VHS, periodicals and even an audio cassette, showing the parallels between the new normal theater of 2020 with the HIV scare of the 1980s and 90s.

For example, the documentary includes an interview with Charles Geshekter Ph.D., a three-time Fulbright scholar who teaches African history at California State University in Chico. He explains how the WHO came to the conclusion that AIDS in Africa could be diagnosed with a broad list of common symptoms, just like COVID:

“A fever, a persistent cough, loose stools for 30 days, and a ten-percent loss of bodyweight over a two month period.”

The entire film is packed with such parallels. Another example, later in the documentary, states: “Over the last 36 years, Fauci has repeated the claim that all his AIDS patients were ‘otherwise healthy.’ ”

Yet, a clip with a gay historian, Mark Gabrish Conlan, shows that such victims were not healthy at all:

“The very first AIDS cases were five gay men diagnosed in Los Angeles in 1981… What linked them was that they were all in the ‘fast lane gay lifestyle…’ They were taking many different [recreational] drugs at the same time, combining drugs, much more than was the pattern for straight drug users. They also partied a lot, at the bars, the clubs, the bathhouses. They met a lot of men, had a lot of anonymous sexual contact. As a result they were exposed to a lot of the classic sexually transmitted diseases — like syphilis and gonorrhea. Because they were getting those diseases, they were also frequently going to doctors and getting antibiotic prescriptions….”

“All that created a situation where a handful of gay men were burning the candle at both ends and putting a blowtorch to the middle. It’s no wonder that after a while their immune systems started to collapse and they started getting sick in these unusual ways that previously had only been seen in older people whose immune systems had deteriorated from age.”

Today, Fauci and company have expanded their case load from a fringe group of homosexuals to the 73 million baby boomer population in the United States.Of course, we are now being told, the old are dying from COVID-19. As if, before the coronavirus went novel, frail nursing home residents were “otherwise healthy” and not already succumbing to respiratory diseases.

Just like, before AIDS, the overuse of antibiotics and a wide range of “party” drugs by a small subset of the gay male community was not severely compromising to health.

These recreational drugs included “poppers,” an immune-suppressing inhalant widely used and sold in gay clubs and bathhouses. As the documentary shows, poppers were heavily advertised in most gay magazines.

Of course, why would heavy narcotic use have anything to do with the collapse of their immune system? We are assured, two-thirds through the film, by much younger version of Anthony Fauci:

“There have been a number of theories as to what the origin of HIV/AIDS is. One of them was a theory that certainly turned out to be completely incorrect — that it is a lifestyle phenomenon.”

Anthony Fauci

36 Years of Lies, Misinformation and Manipulation

“The documentary includes footage of Fauci at various points in his career, starting in 1984 and extending to the present, describing his work in his own words,” says producer, Ken McCarthy. “This is how Anthony Fauci built his career, credibility, and political base.”

McCarthy studied neuroscience at Princeton University in the late 1970s under Bart Hoebel, a pioneer in the study of sugar addiction. McCarthy is considered a pioneer, himself, in the field of internet marketing. A Time Magazine article credits Ken McCarthy’s insights into click-through tracking as a key factor in the commercialization of the World Wide Web.

Such marketing expertise makes McCarthy keenly aware of the true motivations behind mandating a COVID-19 vaccine.

“You have to understand, the vaccine business is fantastic,” he jokingly states in a interview on the The Finding Genius podcast. “Government mandated means [vaccines] have no marketing costs. Universal? Most markets are niche, even big markets. I can’t sell hair curlers to bald men; but [they] can dictate that every child in America get a vaccine….”

“If [they] can dictate that every breathing human being in America gets a vaccine the money becomes mind-boggling.”

In additional to pioneering fundamental elements of the commercial Internet, McCarthy has also been a pioneer of independent online journalism.

“In 1995, I organized and hosted the first conference on the subject of web-based reporting for local news markets,” he explains. “In 1997, as a demonstration of the potential of the medium, I produced what is still the most detailed documentation of an election fraud – the 1997 San Francisco 49er Stadium Bond Initiative – that appears in any format.”

And now he has compiled a detailed documentary showing how Anthony Fauci sold the HIV/AIDS scare in the 1980s, and is doing so again in 2020 with a brand new set of acronyms.

Kary Mullis

Kary Mullis full interview: 

https://youtu.be/nuWH1zFfX5A

For another look at our new idols (Fauci et al). Here’s some help. 

Kary Mullis in pink t-shirt, Nobel Prize winner, Chemistry, 1993, full interview, 1996. Listen to him in conversation interviewed.

Listen to him describe the reality of AIDS diagnosis and “treatment”.

How many, millions (?) of perfectly healthy people were diagnosed because of a detected virus, then “treated” with an old (and banned) chemotherapy drug, “AZT”, which, doctors directed them to take until they died, sometimes for years.

Parallels to today are disturbing. Same players too. Same playbook. Larger scope. 

Yeah, geniuses today, you see geniuses everywhere today, they call Mullis “bizzarre”, “conspiracy theorist”…

Idiocy, Magical Thinking, Corruption, and TDS

The idea that we can end respiratory illness with vaccines or masks or distancing is, very simply, idiocy.

If a vaccine reduced the effect of some virus, then another virus will take its place in human respiratory illness. To believe otherwise is magical thinking.

Idiocy and magical thinking are the basic narrative premises of “Covid 19”.

The other factor at work is the engine of the apparatus. The engine is simple (though on enormous scale) corruption.

There’s another essential factor.

Corruption, idiocy, and magical thinking are not enough. There must be some other factor that suppresses normal human reason, that otherwise would resist, oppose, and call out corruption, idiocy, and magical thinking.

So there is this other factor, the role of which is to suppress normal human reason. This factor, I suggest, is Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) which was cultivated systematically for 5 years and has profound effect over much of the US and far beyond the US, throughout large parts of Europe and Latin America for example.


There’s a simple answer.

How can all previous frameworks of reason, evidence, and caution be dumped into the landfill?How can principles of medicine like “first do no harm” be set ablaze, incinerated?

How can disease projection models be so wildly inaccurate, while those running the show are still believed?

How can those calling the shots demonstrate zero concern for the effects of their policy apparatus while maintaining their interest in nothing but their fanatical mission to inject every person on earth with their products, repeatedly?

How can the idea of a RUSH TO INJECT every person on earth be taken as a commitment to reason and science? CAUTION thrown to the wind. Surrender to the MANIC RUSH. How is that consistent with principles of science, testing, evidence, and public health, and humanitarianism?

How is it that this is being PUSHED? And how is it that it’s being followed?

The answers are EASY:

  1. The people PUSHING it are psychotic mother fuckers. And corrupt scumbags.
  2. The people following it were born yesterday. They hear no evil. See no evil. Corruption is inconceivable to them. They’ve been so sheltered, living on fantasy island 🏝 where everyone’s good and the wealthy and powerful are like mommy and daddy carefully planning for good management and the safety and care of everyone. They don’t know what corruption is. It doesn’t look like anything to them. They can’t see it. Even when, or especially when, it’s right out in the open, and pervasive.

Not Even, as it’s injected right into their arm:

Anthony Fauci: 40 Years of Lies From AZT to Remdesivir

 Oct 27, 2020  312

As the planet’s “Virus Tsar” since 1984, he has spread misinformation and ignored critical questions. The consequences could hardly be more fatal.

https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/27/anthony-fauci-40-years-of-lies-from-azt-to-remdesivir/

Categories
Uncategorized

a party of and for extreme far right reactionaries: The Democratic Party

Essential. A friend writes:

“It’s interesting, people on the so-called right have been sounding more and more like peacenik hippies lately. They’ve taken the anti-war position, they’re promoting personal freedoms, anti-corporatism, self-sufficiency, organic local food – even farmers markets have become a ‘dogwhistle’ for nationalism. Meanwhile the so called left have gone full-on authoritarian, pro-CIA police-state globalist empire, rat on your neighbors, single-family houses are elitist and should be demolished to make way for big developments, we should all eat lab-grown manufactured ‘sustainable’ food instead of labour intensive real food, they’ve unwittingly become completely appallingly racist….. Since the Bush era the propaganda target has shifted from the right to the Liberal/left. Then (since Bernie became a threat) they’ve gone all-in to try to destroy the credibility of the populist (for the people) message. The biggest ruse of them all was to convince sh!tlibs that populism is a nefarious force.

When left to their own devices people aren’t that different, Both ‘sides’ can easily be coached into extreme positions by manipulative media (yes, I’m arguing that the so-called ‘Liberal’ left have been tricked en-masse into taking up extremist, completely insane positions).”

DE: Sounds reactionary. Any take making a false equivalency between the right and left is so far out of bounds. Plenty of neo-Nazis push this narrative. The fact that you would share this quote and thought it was deep is revealing.

  • KV: ima be honest I don’t care about your labeling by association Doesn’t mean anything to me 
  • DE: just say you’re a Republican bro. PragerU is hiring
  • KV: Exactly you can only think in simple oppositional terms You’re not capable of actually thinking
  • RS: The Democratic Party is reactionary. Has been since the 90s at least. It’s a party of and for extreme far right reactionaries. That you’re unaware of that is the mystery of the century
  • DE: I don’t disagree that the two capitalist parties are reactionary. But your post didn’t mention the Democratic Party. The fashy statement you made was: meanwhile the so called Left have gone full on authoritarian. Then you made some other nonsensical statements that isn’t worth dissecting. Based on what you wrote you probably think you’re a victim of cancel culture. Tucker Carlson would be happy to have you on the show
  • RS: The US political establishment in its entirety is full-on authoritarian with zero redeeming qualities. Here’s what I think: 

Covid

https://youtu.be/QAHi3lX3oGM

This is testimony about the failure of the medical profession (in the US at least; other countries will need their own investigations) to provide any treatment at all to patients who receive a positive Covid test, for 2 weeks before they then arrive at a hospital.

If that doesn’t strike you as abnormal, and even on the surface, as stupid, then do a self sanity check now. For those who’ve recognized this systematic failure/refusal to treat patients, the testimony here paints a clear and extremely disturbing picture. The picture happens to be consistent with decades worth of similar malfeasance surrounding Anthony Fauci, NIH, et al.

Corruption

Anyone who says what Fauci/Gates says but who is not a celebrity and not an intently focused criminal schemer and not integrally networked together with other like-minded criminal schemers, would be seen as nothing other than a psychotic douchecan. But put all those together, and a psychotic douchecan is accepted as a god.

Same fraud, same playbook, same criminal scheme, bigger scope this time. 

https://www.globalresearch.ca/fauci-first-fraud-documentary-exposes-decades-old-lies-behind-man-cancelled-thanksgiving/5730282

The film destroys Fauci’s credibility

Duration 1:33:49 Fauci’s First Fraud is a 2020 independent film exposing how Fauci perpetuated misinformation over the AIDS pandemic leading to millions of deaths.“The Nobel Prize winner who discovered HIV, Luc Montagnier, said it does not cause AIDS,” explained producer, Ken McCarthy in an email interview.

“Another Nobel Prize winner, Kary Mullis — the one who invented the HIV PCR test that Fauci used to find ‘infected cases’ among the healthy — called the use of the test for diagnosis of AIDS a fraud.”

Sound familiar?

Watch the film at the link.

Remarkable Parallels Between the AIDS and COVID Scare.

The description for this documentary about the 1980’s AIDS scamdemic reads like the COVID-19 headlines of 2020:

“A deadly new virus is discovered… There’s no treatment or cure… It’s highly contagious… Everyone is a potential victim… The world is at risk from asymptomatic super spreaders… New clusters of cases reported daily…“

Everyone must get tested even though the tests are unreliable… Positive antibody tests are called ‘infections’ and ‘cases’ even when the patient has no symptoms… Every politician gets involved… Media hysteria in high gear… Activists demand salvation from government and Big Pharma…

“Billions of dollars are authorized for fast track drug and vaccine research… Simple, effective remedies are rejected while expensive, dangerous ones are pushed……Presumptive diagnoses… Exaggerated death statistics… Falsified death certificates…”

It would seem that the only significant factor differentiating the AIDS pandemic from the COVID scandal is scale. As McCarthy explains:

“Every single fraud technique being used today to ‘sell’ COVID hysteria was invented in the 1980s and 1990s by Tony Fauci to sell the AIDS fraud.”

The New Normal May Not Be All That New After All

The documentary presents a compilation of interviews, press releases and documents collected from YouTube, VHS, periodicals and even an audio cassette, showing the parallels between the new normal theater of 2020 with the HIV scare of the 1980s and 90s.

For example, the documentary includes an interview with Charles Geshekter Ph.D., a three-time Fulbright scholar who teaches African history at California State University in Chico. He explains how the WHO came to the conclusion that AIDS in Africa could be diagnosed with a broad list of common symptoms, just like COVID:

“A fever, a persistent cough, loose stools for 30 days, and a ten-percent loss of bodyweight over a two month period.”

The entire film is packed with such parallels. Another example, later in the documentary, states: “Over the last 36 years, Fauci has repeated the claim that all his AIDS patients were ‘otherwise healthy.’ ”

Yet, a clip with a gay historian, Mark Gabrish Conlan, shows that such victims were not healthy at all:

“The very first AIDS cases were five gay men diagnosed in Los Angeles in 1981… What linked them was that they were all in the ‘fast lane gay lifestyle…’ They were taking many different [recreational] drugs at the same time, combining drugs, much more than was the pattern for straight drug users. They also partied a lot, at the bars, the clubs, the bathhouses. They met a lot of men, had a lot of anonymous sexual contact. As a result they were exposed to a lot of the classic sexually transmitted diseases — like syphilis and gonorrhea. Because they were getting those diseases, they were also frequently going to doctors and getting antibiotic prescriptions….”

“All that created a situation where a handful of gay men were burning the candle at both ends and putting a blowtorch to the middle. It’s no wonder that after a while their immune systems started to collapse and they started getting sick in these unusual ways that previously had only been seen in older people whose immune systems had deteriorated from age.”

Today, Fauci and company have expanded their case load from a fringe group of homosexuals to the 73 million baby boomer population in the United States.Of course, we are now being told, the old are dying from COVID-19. As if, before the coronavirus went novel, frail nursing home residents were “otherwise healthy” and not already succumbing to respiratory diseases.

Just like, before AIDS, the overuse of antibiotics and a wide range of “party” drugs by a small subset of the gay male community was not severely compromising to health.

These recreational drugs included “poppers,” an immune-suppressing inhalant widely used and sold in gay clubs and bathhouses. As the documentary shows, poppers were heavily advertised in most gay magazines.

Of course, why would heavy narcotic use have anything to do with the collapse of their immune system? We are assured, two-thirds through the film, by much younger version of Anthony Fauci:

“There have been a number of theories as to what the origin of HIV/AIDS is. One of them was a theory that certainly turned out to be completely incorrect — that it is a lifestyle phenomenon.”

Anthony Fauci

36 Years of Lies, Misinformation and Manipulation

“The documentary includes footage of Fauci at various points in his career, starting in 1984 and extending to the present, describing his work in his own words,” says producer, Ken McCarthy. “This is how Anthony Fauci built his career, credibility, and political base.”

McCarthy studied neuroscience at Princeton University in the late 1970s under Bart Hoebel, a pioneer in the study of sugar addiction. McCarthy is considered a pioneer, himself, in the field of internet marketing. A Time Magazine article credits Ken McCarthy’s insights into click-through tracking as a key factor in the commercialization of the World Wide Web.

Such marketing expertise makes McCarthy keenly aware of the true motivations behind mandating a COVID-19 vaccine.

“You have to understand, the vaccine business is fantastic,” he jokingly states in a interview on the The Finding Genius podcast. “Government mandated means [vaccines] have no marketing costs. Universal? Most markets are niche, even big markets. I can’t sell hair curlers to bald men; but [they] can dictate that every child in America get a vaccine….”

“If [they] can dictate that every breathing human being in America gets a vaccine the money becomes mind-boggling.”

In additional to pioneering fundamental elements of the commercial Internet, McCarthy has also been a pioneer of independent online journalism.

“In 1995, I organized and hosted the first conference on the subject of web-based reporting for local news markets,” he explains. “In 1997, as a demonstration of the potential of the medium, I produced what is still the most detailed documentation of an election fraud – the 1997 San Francisco 49er Stadium Bond Initiative – that appears in any format.”

And now he has compiled a detailed documentary showing how Anthony Fauci sold the HIV/AIDS scare in the 1980s, and is doing so again in 2020 with a brand new set of acronyms.

Kary Mullis

Kary Mullis full interview: 

https://youtu.be/nuWH1zFfX5A

For another look at our new idols (Fauci et al). Here’s some help. 

Kary Mullis in pink t-shirt, Nobel Prize winner, Chemistry, 1993, full interview, 1996. Listen to him in conversation interviewed.

Listen to him describe the reality of AIDS diagnosis and “treatment”.

How many, millions (?) of perfectly healthy people were diagnosed because of a detected virus, then “treated” with an old (and banned) chemotherapy drug, “AZT”, which, doctors directed them to take until they died, sometimes for years.

Parallels to today are disturbing. Same players too. Same playbook. Larger scope. 

Yeah, geniuses today, you see geniuses everywhere today, they call Mullis “bizzarre”, “conspiracy theorist”…

Idiocy, Magical Thinking, Corruption, and TDS

The idea that we can end respiratory illness with vaccines or masks or distancing is, very simply, idiocy.

If a vaccine reduced the effect of some virus, then another virus will take its place in human respiratory illness. To believe otherwise is magical thinking.

Idiocy and magical thinking are the basic narrative premises of “Covid 19”.

The other factor at work is the engine of the apparatus. The engine is simple (though on enormous scale) corruption.

There’s another essential factor.

Corruption, idiocy, and magical thinking are not enough. There must be some other factor that suppresses normal human reason, that otherwise would resist, oppose, and call out corruption, idiocy, and magical thinking.

So there is this other factor, the role of which is to suppress normal human reason. This factor, I suggest, is Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) which was cultivated systematically for 5 years and has profound effect over much of the US and far beyond the US, throughout large parts of Europe and Latin America for example.


There’s a simple answer.

How can all previous frameworks of reason, evidence, and caution be dumped into the landfill?How can principles of medicine like “first do no harm” be set ablaze, incinerated?

How can disease projection models be so wildly inaccurate, while those running the show are still believed?

How can those calling the shots demonstrate zero concern for the effects of their policy apparatus while maintaining their interest in nothing but their fanatical mission to inject every person on earth with their products, repeatedly?

How can the idea of a RUSH TO INJECT every person on earth be taken as a commitment to reason and science? CAUTION thrown to the wind. Surrender to the MANIC RUSH. How is that consistent with principles of science, testing, evidence, and public health, and humanitarianism?

How is it that this is being PUSHED? And how is it that it’s being followed?

The answers are EASY:

  1. The people PUSHING it are psychotic mother fuckers. And corrupt scumbags.
  2. The people following it were born yesterday. They hear no evil. See no evil. Corruption is inconceivable to them. They’ve been so sheltered, living on fantasy island 🏝 where everyone’s good and the wealthy and powerful are like mommy and daddy carefully planning for good management and the safety and care of everyone. They don’t know what corruption is. It doesn’t look like anything to them. They can’t see it. Even when, or especially when, it’s right out in the open, and pervasive.

Not Even, as it’s injected right into their arm:

Anthony Fauci: 40 Years of Lies From AZT to Remdesivir

 Oct 27, 2020  312

As the planet’s “Virus Tsar” since 1984, he has spread misinformation and ignored critical questions. The consequences could hardly be more fatal.

https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/27/anthony-fauci-40-years-of-lies-from-azt-to-remdesivir/

Categories
Uncategorized

Third Sunrise in Three Days

Any info on countries reporting a third wave?

“Third wave” is again the use of the technique of “false premise that’s literally true”

The technique presumes an opposition based on disproving what is literally true. The unstated false premise is that a wave is preventable by any means. It’s like a third sunrise in 3 days. Opposing a “false premise that’s literally true” does NOT involve arguing that the sun doesn’t rise on the third day.

Most people are entirely ill-prepared to handle rhetoric of this kind. Simpler “False Premise”, yeah, they can argue against it. Just call it false.

But this is different:

The sun will rise a third time in 3 days.

Stated separately:

We must wear masks and vaccinate to protect ourselves.

(from the third sunrise in 3 days)

+++++++++

True debate, on the unstated false premise — that a wave is preventable by any means — is derailed. It never happens. Because people get drawn instead into trying to argue that a third wave doesn’t exist.

Real debate involves making the point that waves happened regularly like clockwork in the past, and will happen again regularly like clockwork in the future.

This useful debate is made impossible by the technique of “false premise that’s literally true” (there is a third wave), (there is a variant), (etc.), which invites AND PRESUMES the absurd counter argument that (no, there is no third wave, variant, the sun will NOT rise in 3 days, etc.). Many people of good intention take the bait, are hooked, and kill their own capacity for reason. Naturally they lose the argument, and whatever was at stake in having the argument in the first place.

It’s a good idea to start recognizing when this tactic is used against you, your being, and your argument.

False Premise that's Literally True

There are people who say “but it’s real”, as if that means the premise of the Covid narrative is real. This is because of the construction of the narrative itself, again the classic technique: “false premise that’s literally true”.

It is true that Covid-like illness exists. But the unstated false premise is that there ever has been, or ever will be, a time when Covid-like illness does not, did not, and will not exist.

We live in a world of viruses and illness and death. If magical drug and mask techniques could magically eliminate some virus type, another would immediately take its place. To believe otherwise is irrational idiocy.

This was common knowledge since the 19th century. Immunity is natural and earned through natural evolution. This ability breaks down with age and injury leading to inevitable death, by natural causes. This knowledge has been erased in a few weeks last year by mass media false premise, a machine of fear.

https://zachfresa.com/2020/05/16/to-no-germs-do-we-succumb-without-a-struggle-and-to-many-those-that-cause-putrefaction-in-dead-matter-for-instance-our-living-frames-are-altogether-immune/

Death rates have been and remain near historic lows.

Discourse is absolutely DROWNED by this tactic, false premise that’s literally true, driving pseudo-debate. Read any comment thread under any news article. False premise (embedded lie) is guzzled down like coffee drinking addiction or alcoholism.

The description of pseudo-debate in this article by Ed Curtin is essential. Pseudo-debate destroys the necessary action of real debate: the challenging of embedded false premises (lies). Without this necessary act, embedded false premises (lies) are accepted, involuntarily, or lazily.

Pseudo-debate replaces the action of challenging false premises, replacing it with involuntary (subconscious) acceptance of lies. This replacement is so common, and taken-up with such gusto and conviction, that one begins to wonder if, actually, it is conscious and voluntary. Full description of “pseudo-debate” in the article:

https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/21/media-pseudo-debates-and-the-silence-of-leftist-critics/


https://fb.watch/4pIEj7u0w1/ << Click this video link.

I don’t give a shit that it’s posted by Sean Hannity, (a conservative) and is said by Rand Paul (a libertarian). What matters is what’s said by Fauci (a lifetime corrupt fraud). What Fauci is saying, in response to the question, is:

— totally insane

— supports his corporate funded agenda (fear induced dependence on shit drugs)

— irrational, psychotic Fauci is using the technique of “false premise that’s literally true”.

There ARE virus variants. That is true. And it is always true. What’s not true is that people need injections of shit drugs to deal with viruses. And it is not true that people need to be told by authorities they trust (god only knows why) to cover their faces in fear of the world itself.

https://fb.watch/4pIMRu3Cu2/ << Click the video link.

Yep, that’s exactly how we get people showing up with respiratory illness that looks, to healthcare workers, worse than previous years.

Listen to the TWO first hand stories here and then ask yourself: are these stories COMMON? And if they are common, is it due to induced SYSTEMATIC medical malpractice driven by the Covid agenda and policy apparatus?

Martin Larner writes:

“I’m convinced that what mostly happened was a cascade of untreated Viral Pneumonia’s due to Isolation and Lockdown policies. Hospitals wouldn’t normally have seen these people because they would have got timely diagnosis and treatment at the doctor, given Macrolide Antibiotics and Cortisone for the Flu-like Lung inflammation, advised to take Zinc and Vits, then recovered at home no problems. Instead they worsened under Lockdown and the suspension of doctors appointments and presented at hospitals with Cytokine Storms after 10 days or two weeks. Then the stupid Nurses & Doctors put them on Ventilators which killed them. 

Many more were caused because confinement’s increased such infections. Many other serious illnesses also increased under confinement. Much of this was passed off as “Covid”. Thousands more died at home because they were terrorised into avoiding hospitals or were denied an ambulance for their heart attack or stroke. I’ve seen the ONS figures. Deaths at home were massively up last year. Most of the rest is just misattribution which constitutes criminal fraud. Many Doctors and other health officials should face prosecution along with the Government and the charlatans they employ as “Advisors”. 

What a Fucking shit show. “

Yep, that’s exactly how we get people showing up with respiratory illness that looks, to healthcare workers, worse than previous years. Listen to the TWO first hand stories here and then ask yourself: are these stories COMMON? And if they are common, is it due to induced SYSTEMATIC medical malpractice driven by the Covid agenda and policy apparatus? https://fb.watch/4pFWdBiHt-/

By the way, as the meme said…

Switching from Trump to Biden is like shitting your pants and changing your shirt

From my blog last summer. I didn’t mention fucking Covid in this one, but same shit:

Third Sunrise in Three Days
Categories
Uncategorized

We Want to Do Everything Possible

This is a story about doing everything possible.

This is a work of fiction. Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events, is purely coincidental. 

By the way:

The Strange Reason Nearly Every Film Ends by Saying It’s Fiction (You Guessed It: Rasputin!)

Sara

You want to know why?

Daryl

Yeah. Tell me the reason. I remember he said his department was, what, declared (?), the best in the state.

Sara

He said they talked about it and given that last year’s restrictions have to end, he said,

We want to do everything possible to end the situation.

Daryl

Every thing possible…

“We want to do everything possible”

Oh…

thinking…

I see. That’s the motivator: “doing everything possible”.

thinking some more…

You know, he’s a young guy. Which is relevant only because he hasn’t been around long enough to develop doubts, about anything. Like, where do those ideas come from? Like, how many people right now over the whole country, in every country, are saying exactly those words right now?

Our unit is the best. Our group, Our department. The best.

They’re all “the best”. And they’re all “doing everything possible”.

And he hasn’t been around long enough to develop any curiosity about how rhetoric is designed, and distributed, and for what purpose? He still believes in genuine benevolence, right? Of Everything. He’s never heard of corruption. Or thinks it’s “conspiracy theory”. Or anyway, even where corruption exists (on TV crime shows for example),

the people in our group, in our department, they’re all good people, doing their dedicated best, to do their jobs right. So corruption doesn’t reach here.

But more importantly, he hasn’t had time, or exposure, to thinking about, well, logic. The mechanism of logic. The inevitability of the path, guaranteed and dictated, by logic. Logic is a merciless master. And doing everything possible, is logic’s mace, or club, for beating. Logic weaponized.

Come to think of it. Yeah. Doing everything possible is likely the worst possible motivation for doing anything. Because everything is already justified beforehand. Limits are removed to begin with. No holds are barred. The end justifies the means. Might is right. And the flesh of humanity is divided already at the outset. Between those doing everything possible, and those standing in the way, obstacles to doing everything possible.

What happens to such people? What happens to obstacles?

Well, anything necessary. Because we’re doing everything possible.

And where does that lead?

Well, we can measure the temperature of the rhetoric and the intensity of the campaign, and recognize the inevitable, and even the proximate, end.

I lived a few months in 2020, near here, in Berlin. Walked past these markers daily.

At different levels:

  • as individuals,
  • as an institution,
  • a government,
  • a global corporation,
  • as an organized aristocracy of (cororate/financial) power, or whatever,

we could choose to make determinations of healthcare strategies/tools, based on reasonable evaluations of evidence, based on genuinely creative science, based on innovation, uh, carefully, based on reasonable evaluation of the merits of traditionally effective practical solutions, and so on.

But, we live in a world now where the bottom two on the list above are the only operative actors. The organized aristocracy is in total control, and everything above them in that list is convinced to “do everything possible“, and convinced (actively), that it is their idea to do so. This of course is the functioning of rhetoric doing exactly what it is designed to do, flawlessly. Those who design this rhetoric, know what they’re doing.

Everyone else carries out the orders embedded within the rhetoric The rhetoric acts as a trojan horse with surprise cargo inside. It’s stealth cargo. Those taking it onboard believe themselves to be doing everything possible, independently, of their own free and good will.

Snake Oil

Pharmaceuticals, are one the world’s biggest industries. Today obviously It’s the modern version of quacks, snake oil salesmen, magical thinking, and voodoo, all mystified behind a facade called “science”, while science itself is abused behind that facade.

And remember the history of snake oil. A lot of snake oil is poison. Now there’s a whole industry of selling antibodies. Maybe you haven’t heard of that yet. But you will. See article here and the short video:

https://thewallwillfall.org/2021/03/05/the-antibody-deception-rosemary-frei/

Custom antibodies! And that’s science!

Snake oil these days is pushed with the full force of the state, the military, even empire behind it. Corruption infests the medical industry at a scale and pervasiveness incomprehensible to mortals. And, the entire apparatus of mass media is captured for use as a tool of coercion.

Always presented, as SCIENCE.

Science has a certain look, a style. It looks

  • articulate,
  • well-presented,
  • logical, and
  • compelling.

There is a problem though with the criteria “articulate, well-presented, logical, and compelling”.

Compelling is 4th in the list, following the first 3, evidently rightly so as it follows as the effect of the first 3. I mean, “compelling” is not operative. Rather, it’s the effect of the operatives, the first 3. The first 2 operatives are style-related, often; superficial, often.

That leaves logic carrying most of the weight of the sentence. The problem is that logic is revealed lately as a mechanism of lock-in, of inevitability, more so than what we’d hope for logic, logic as a method producing clear thinking. Once a faulty premise (any faulty premise) is accepted, widely, then it is precisely logic that guarantees every step following from the premise. Logic demands each subsequent step, one strictly logical step after another, all the way to the most horrifying conceivable conclusion, an unbroken chain of consistent logic all the way to the end.

I’m just sayin’, logic won’t solve the problem. I may choose to accept the premise of some issue important to mass media rhetoric today. If I do accept it, then logic enforces all of the subsequent steps, all the way to horror. Logic won’t break the chain. Logic IS the chain. There has to be something else. I don’t know what it is. Something that causes a re-evaluation of the premise.

Logic can be well used there, to evaluate a premise. But there has to be something else that initiates the will to re-evaluate to begin with. Otherwise logic is not used for that.

That is why, evidently, scientists, and doctors, for example, are ill-equipped to do anything about the ruin of science, and medicine, itself. That is to say, when the entire apparatus of science, and medicine, is captured and distorted by the tentacles of corruption operating at a scale and scope incomprehensible to those of good will, weaponizing science, and medicine, for the torture of humanity, and its enslavement.

We’re doing everything possible.

Indeed.

One hopes that you soon stop doing that. And start walking back, about 10 steps.

Categories
Uncategorized

if this remains broken – we are not going to like the world that results

Met someone today, my age. Although she seemed to think the vaccine would make things normal (she was reluctant to take it), she made more sense than most. Said school closings is a crime, she lost all confidence in government. We should not keep young people inside, the 70+ are out all the time anyway.

People like her need to be told the truth. It will not end with vaccine. This is an agenda. Perpetual torture. The agenda needs to be met with opposition 

Opposition has to organize

The facts needed to understand that it won’t end (with vaccine) are here:

https://zachfresa.com/2021/02/24/endless-cruelty/

One thing is that the official data from early trials cited by Pfizer and Moderna (it’s their own data and report) show that 100 people have to be vaccinated for 1 person to have a reduction in at least 1 Covid symptom. That means 99% of vaccinated people are not effected positively with regard to Covid.

This is spun by the pharma companies and media and government as “95% efficacy”. The method they use to arrive at that is written in their own report. I copied it in the blog post https://zachfresa.com/2021/02/24/endless-cruelty/

There’s more in the blog:

  • Gates’ desire for a “platform” of vaccine production, etc.
  • Endless testing
  • Endless variants
  • Endless masking
  • Endless lockdown
  • Endless injections
  • Endless cruelty

FACTS why not to take the injections; make a list from this article: https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/22/synthetic-mrna-covid-vaccines-a-risk-benefit-analysis/ 

And we KNOW the results of infection, so testing (antigen or PCR) is pointless.

Here is the result of infection: https://softwaredevelopmentperestroika.wordpress.com/2021/02/23/covid-sweden-final-mortality-based-on-the-now-official-2020-death-data-from-scb/  (i.e., the result is… nothing)

What do you think will happen if positive result from antigen test?

“I will have to stay home”

And how often this testing?

From Pfizer and Moderna’s own published statements, again, the vaccines have no positive effect with regard to Covid on 99% of the vaccinated.

So what is the point of testing?

Read the article https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/22/synthetic-mrna-covid-vaccines-a-risk-benefit-analysis/ The media promotes “95% efficacy”. I think you will be shocked to see what that actually means. It’s from their own report. What it actually means is in the article, citing the Pfizer and Moderna publications directly.

“authorities want to break the spreading of the “silent asymptomatic” spread.”

Therefore they are then attempting to solve an unsolvable problem. That’s not science, or scientific.

The virus does not affect death rates negatively. And the vaccines have no positive effect on 99% of the vaccinated. That’s from their own literature. 

This is a test of basic human rationality. If this remains broken, we are not going to like the world that results. 

“They don’t talk about deaths. Their argument is strain on health care.”

Again read the article. From their own literature, the negative effect on health, and therefore, strain on healthcare, from the vaccines is at least triple the negative effect of the virus. This is from their own literature .

This is a test of basic human rationality. If this remains broken, we are not going to like the world that results.

We can’t go around solving unsolvable problems and making life a hell on earth

That’s not science.

Categories
Uncategorized

endless cruelty

Efficacy analysis breakdown here https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/22/synthetic-mrna-covidvaccines-a-risk-benefit-analysis/ 

We know the TV and the newspapers tell us all that the vaccines “have shown a 95% efficacy rate in trials”. Now, the ordinary reader is going to interpret that to mean that 95% of the people who take the injections are going to be protected from Covid 19. However that is so far away from accurate that “95% efficacy” can only be viewed as intentionally misleading,

(aka: lying).

The stupidity of this is overwhelming, along with the cynical malicious scheming of the whole psychological manipulation and the corruption. The mind is blown.

From the article:

“To reiterate, in both trials, once one/two symptoms appeared in a participant, it was designated a “case” or “event” when coupled with a positive PCR “test”. Once 170 “cases” occurred in Pfizer/BioNtech trial, and 196 “cases” occurred in Moderna trial, this data was used to calculate efficacy. Shockingly, only under 200 cases for a novel therapy which is being deployed/subjected on millions of people around the world.

Furthermore, people are not being informed that “95%” or so efficacy, is calculated based on a useless metric of relative efficacy and is therefore very misleading.

Eg.Pfizer/BioNtech:

8 “cases” in vaccine group

162 “cases” in placebo group

8/162 = 5%

100%-5%= 95%

Therefore, they are claiming that the synthetic gene therapy injections are 95% efficacious. What they are not factoring in is the size of the denominator. If it is large, then with 8 vs 162, the difference becomes less significant. It matters how many people were in each group, for example, whether this be 200, 2,000, or 20,000.

This is the absolute risk reduction for Pfizer/BioNtech, each group had over 18,000 people!

Injection Group: 8/18,198 = 0.04%

Placebo Group: 162/18,325= 0.88%

Therefore, the absolute risk reduction for Primary Efficacy Endpoint is 0.84%. (ie. 0.88-0.04)

https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/22/synthetic-mrna-covid-vaccines-a-risk-benefit-analysis/

This means, that someone who takes the Pfizer/BioNtech injection, has less than 1% chance of reducing at least one symptom of non-severe “Covid” for a period of 2 months. This means that someone who takes this injection has over 99% chance that it won’t work, regarding the efficacy. Over 100 people have to be injected for it to “work” in one person.”

https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/22/synthetic-mrna-covid-vaccines-a-risk-benefit-analysis/

There are many issues with the trial data, and design. It must be noted that PCR tests are not fit for purpose and without Sanger sequencing we have no idea how many of these people actually had “Covid” vs another respiratory virus or something else. This is a preeminent reason why Dr Yeadon and Dr Wodarg filed a Stay of Action on the vaccine trials.

As Dr Peter Doshi, Associate Editor of BMJ highlighted, access to the raw data is required to further elucidate the areas of concern:

With 20 times more suspected covid-19 than confirmed covid-19, and trials not designed to assess whether the vaccines can interrupt viral transmission, an analysis of severe disease irrespective of etiologic agent—namely, rates of hospitalizations, ICU cases, and deaths amongst trial participants—seems warranted, and is the only way to assess the vaccines’ real ability to take the edge off the pandemic.”

Approximately 5-6 symptoms listed as “side effects” are the same as Covid symptoms. Pfizer/BioNtech only started counting “cases” one week after the second dose, and Moderna, 2 weeks after the second dose. Therefore, if these side effects were labelled as “Covid” symptoms instead, even the paltry efficacy of about 1% would be relegated into the negative integers.

In others words, the injected group may have been sicker with “Covid” more than the placebo group.

There have been many critiques of the applicability of the limited data to the general populace, especially the vulnerable elderly. An important analysis of this was done by Dr James Lyons-Weiler who discovered the general population is dying at a rate 6.3 times the rate of participants in the Moderna trial (including placebo and injection groups).

If Moderna’s on-vaccine death rate is so far below the national death rate and also simultaneously more than five times greater than Pfizer’s on-vaccine death rate, then Pfizer’s study sample appears even less representative of the entire population. This, too, requires due consideration.”

An integral question as to whether Pfizer/BioNtech and Moderna recruited supermen and women for their trials, comes to mind. The incidence of “severe” Covid in Placebo groups which scrutinizing the details, wasn’t necessarily severe presentation, is so low that trials of 30,000-40,000 lacked statistical power to determine reductions in hospitalizations and deaths, according to Tal Zaks, CMO Moderna.

Zaks is correct, the incidence of severe “Covid” was only 0.04% in Pfizer/BioNtech and 0.22% in Moderna. Due to this very low attack rate of severe presentation in the population, the absolute risk reduction in severe presentation, even taking data at face value, is nominal.

Therefore, potential SGT recipients must be informed that to reduce “severe” presentation, chances are over 99.5% that these synthetic gene therapies will not work.

The British Medical Journal has reported:

Hospital admissions and deaths from covid-19 are simply too uncommon in the population being studied for an effective vaccine to demonstrate statistically significant differences in a trial of 30 000 people. The same is true of its ability to save lives or prevent transmission: the trials are not designed to find out.”

To convey informed consent, the side effect profile must also be considered. Up to 80% of injected trial recipients experienced side effects, in a setting for a nebulous syndrome where 80% of people are asymptomatic.

The incidences of immediate side effects in both trials were significant and dwarfed the absolute risk reduction in both the primary efficacy endpoints, as well as for “severe” Covid.

For example, for Moderna 81.9% experienced any systemic reaction. Grade 3 reactions (considered severe) were experienced by 17.4%. This is 79X more likely than the incidence of severe Covid in the Moderna group. (17.4/.22=79X) Based on preliminary reports of adverse events [emphasis added]:

This is an injury rate of 1 in every 40 jabs. This means that the 150 shots necessary to avert one mild case of COVID will cause serious injury to at least three people.

The safety data for both companies is approximately only two months before receiving emergency use authorization status. Therefore, there is no data for mid-long term side effects, as the trials are ongoing.

The estimated completion date for Pfizer/BioNtech trials is Jan 31, 2023. The estimate completion date for Moderna trials is October 27, 2022.

https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/22/synthetic-mrna-covid-vaccines-a-risk-benefit-analysis/

What other lies are we being told?

Are we facing a virus that causes out of the ordinary impact on illness and death?

Let’s look at mortality in Sweden where I live, where there was no lockdown and no masks:

Read these two articles please. I could post a long excerpt from them but instead I recommend reading the two articles in full. I’ve seen nowhere better data analysis.

One table from the second article though, here. What is significant about the Swedish death rate in 2020? (answer is below the graph)

https://softwaredevelopmentperestroika.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/final-report-on-swedish-mortality-2020-anno-covid/

The 2020 Swedish death rate (deaths/population) is LOWER THAN 114 OF THE 120 YEARS IN THE GRAPH.

Someone has translated the post to Italian: https://www.miglioverde.eu/inchiesta-svezia-la-mortalita-del-2020-e-la-stessa-di-quella-del-2012/

I copy the article’s conclusion here:

Conclusion

So, what do we make of all the above facts & figures ? Did Sweden really experience a severe deadly pandemic, a “once in 100 years flu”, with people dying in unprecedented numbers during 2020…? 

A pandemic of a kind we’ve not encountered since the Spanish flu 1918…? Or did Sweden experience a severe flu with mortality about the same as past severe flu’s that tend to occur once or twice in every 20-30 years or so…?

I don’t particularly like the notion of “Excess Deaths”, since most of the time it’s impossible to know the answer to “Excess to what, exactly?”, as explained here, but below graph shows six different values for Swedish Excess Deaths 2020. They range from 7000to 1900, depending on the chosen calculation method and baseline. 

Pick the number most appealing to you and your purposes. 

https://softwaredevelopmentperestroika.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/final-report-on-swedish-mortality-2020-anno-covid/
“Excess Deaths”

In textual form, the Swedish “Excess Deaths” for 2020, computed by comparing “Expectation” vs outcome, with two different baselines, are then as follows:

2020 EXCESS DEATHS : 
Absolute excess deaths cmp baseline 15-18 : 6429 
Absolute excess deaths cmp baseline 15-19 : 6978 
Population adjusted excess deaths cmp baseline 15-18 : 3251 Population adjusted excess deaths cmp baseline 15-19 : 4334 
Age adjusted excess deaths cmp baseline 15-18 : 1901 
Age adjusted excess deaths cmp baseline 15-19 : 3146

Applying the same “Excess” computations to 2019 instead of 2020, instead of “Excess Deaths” we get a significant “Death Deficit”, regardless which calculation method or baseline we use:

2019 DEATH DEFICIT :

Absolute death deficit cmp baseline 15-18 : -2745

Absolute death deficit cmp baseline 15-19 : -2196

Population adjusted death deficit cmp baseline 15-18 : -5384

Population adjusted death deficit cmp baseline 15-19 : -4307

Age adjusted death deficit cmp baseline 15-18 : -6146

Age adjusted death deficit cmp baseline 15-19 : -4916

So even if Covid never would have arrived at all during 2020, the death toll of 2020 would almost certainly been significantly higher than “normal” anyway, due to Dry Tinder-effects

You’ll be the judge over whether the numbers above justify the “World’s Cautionary Tale” designation, or the restrictions on freedom, liberty, future and normal life that have been put in place. 

My personal take on Covid 2020 in Sweden is as follows:

  • Yes, Covid 2020 was real (and continues to be real at least until spring 2021, as all seasonal viruses). The number of deaths 2020 was higher than it should have been, which ever way we define “Excess”. Not exceptionally higher, and far from all the disaster scenarios painted by media, politicians and failed scientists. 
  • Was Covid 2020 our generation’s “Spanish Flu” ? No. Far from it, as can be seen in the graph showing 1918 above, and by comparing mortality rates, where non-age-adjusted mortality 2020 is on par with that of 2012, and age adjusted mortality 2020 on par with 2013. 
  • Was the Swedish Government’s response adequate ? To a large extent yes. Until they panicked and lost their mind in November 2020, and introduced “The Swedish Enabling Act“, a form of legislation that is a disgrace to any nation pretending to be democratic. 
  • Where “The Strategy” failed was in protecting the frail and elderly, particularly in the care homes. The strategy also failed in overall crisis & contingency planning & management, where various governments since the early 90:ies have radically reduced investments and capacity in health care, care of elderly as well as many other vital parts of the societal safety net. So, the frequently repeated “Isolate, or our hospitals will be overwhelmed!” mantra was primarily caused by several decades of catastrophic political decisions and priorities regarding medical care and other critical societal function investments and resources, as much as by the virus itself. 
  • What the future brings will be seen by those who survive. Myself, I’m afraid that more doom & gloom will follow for a long time in the tracks of the “2020 Covid Experience”, even if we should manage to eliminate the virus, e.g. by vaccine, during 2021. The psychological effect on populations having spent a year or more in Lockdown, thus missing most of what makes life and living worthwhile, will be interesting to observe, as will be whether social interaction patterns and behaviors eventually return to normal, or whether our future social interactions will be so deeply ingrained by Anno Covidis that we will, similar to Pavlov’s dogs, continue regarding fellow human beings as potentially deadly virus vectors.
  • Similarly, as this recent article (Swedish) shows – 90000 (!) medical treatments cancelled during 2020 – we will also have to expect further “Excess Deaths” down the road, where these deaths are only indirectly caused by Covid. 

This post will end my own way too long and costly focus on Covid. I will now return to topics that are more rewarding and pleasant to work on.

[A final note: in case a significant number of my readers are interested in trying to reproduce the main numbers of my analysis (nr of deaths, mortality,age adj mortality, excess deaths etc), let me know in the comments and I’ll consider providing a link to where the Python (3.8.6) and Pandas (1.1.0) script I’ve used to analyse the most important mortality data can be downloaded.]

https://softwaredevelopmentperestroika.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/final-report-on-swedish-mortality-2020-anno-covid/

1918!

The news media (and the pharmacology industry through all its tentacles) promotes comparison of 2020 to the 1918 “Spanish flu” pandemic. Reasonable people have understood this to be unfounded distortion since last summer, and yet people do continue repeating the idea that we should tolerate lockdowns, masks, injections, pharma “passports”, and so on, “because we live through a time now like the 1918 pandemic.”

This is intolerable horseshit.

I put the numbers for 2 countries in a table. Compare for yourself.

What to DO then?

Given the facts, that

  • the death rate is unremarkable, and that
  • the experimental “vaccines” are neither safe nor effective

What should be DONE then?

Our fascist overlords are telling us, via ventriloquy through their sock puppets we call “leaders”:

https://www.rt.com/news/516092-covid-vaccinating-whole-world-merkel/

The psychotic cruelty is boundless. The asinine stupidity just takes the breath away, boggles the mind.

(aka: criminal extortion).

The stupidity of this is overwhelming, along with the cynical malicious scheming of the whole psychological manipulation and the corruption. The mind is blown.

How is this happening?

How can this be happening?

What the Fuck? Over

A friend writes:

Gates is responsible for the entire fake pandemic. It’s why you wear a muzzle and are afraid of healthy humans. Testimonials from former WHO employees iterate that Gates calls the shots, because he is the largest individual donor. As well as funding all of the major media. Thus why he is on nearly every screen telling you the future without any pushback. He thinks you’re too stupid to have an independent thought – stop proving him right. 

https://thegrayzone.com/2020/07/08/bill-gates-global-health-policy/ 

Lies, and SABOTAGE:

Of course many people are born yesterday and don’t know what corruption is or how it works. One of the expressions of naïveté looks like this:

“The people where I work are good people, and smart, and do their jobs right, and the organization we work for is good. Corruption, therefore, does not reach here.”

naïveté

Is Bill Gates at the root of everything? Or is he just another ventriloquist’s sock puppet? Ultimately I don’t care because it doesn’t matter. What matters is that the puppet master puts the puppet down. That the ventriloquy goes silent, is made silent.

Human beings are going to have to rise up. To silence the voice of madness.

Madness it is. The latest territory of full spectrum dominance. Dominance now extends to the genetically controlled protein production of every cell in every human body on earth.

This is the doctrine. It recognizes and tolerates no limits.

Take every James Bond film made to date. Take every Bond villain, their crimes, and add them all together. Then multiply those crimes 100 billion times. And, you’re not even beginning to approach the scope of these crimes.

Directives for Doctors

I would like to hear if this same direction was given to doctors in other countries, and if so, whether doctors generally followed that direction.

From the article Italian Doctor: in Covid I Acted as Usual, I Had No Death or ICU Hospitalization

“We general practitioners, every year, usually from October to March, see cases of interstitial pneumonia, atypical pneumonia. And every year we treat them with antibiotics. These are patients who come to the clinic with flu-like symptoms – cough, fever, then “a sense of breathlessness” appears – which do not go away within a few days. The patient’s evaluation and clinical evolution indicate bacterial forms; they are given a macrolide antibiotic (and in the most complicated cases cortisone) and, within a few days, they recover very well with complete resolution of the symptoms.

This year it did not go like this. On 22 February this year, the circulation of a new coronavirus was announced.

The Ministry of Health sent an ordinance to all of us general practitioners, essentially telling us that we were facing a new, unknown virus, for which there was no therapy.

The paradoxical thing is that up to that day we had managed the same patients successfully, without crowding hospitals and intensive care departments; but from that moment it was decided that everything we had done until then could no longer work.

A clinical/therapeutic approach was no longer possible. Since then, we, general practitioners, had to delegate to the Department of Public Health, which does not perform clinical work but epidemiological surveillance; we could only see patients if we were in possession of an FFP2 mask, which I was able to collect from the ASL [local health unit] only on March 30th.

But there is something more serious.

In the ministerial circular, the Minister of Health gave us the following indications on how to approach the sick: isolation and reduction of contacts, use of various PPE, disincentives to patients’ initiative to resort to health services, first aid, general practitioners.

Thus, people who were ill were isolated; and, what is even more serious, the public helpline number provided did not respond.

All the patients complained that no one answered; I myself have tried to call 1500 without success. Does a Health Minister preparing to deal with a health emergency expect public help numbers not to respond?

A disaster.

In short: the atypical pneumonias were no longer treated with antibiotics, the patients were left alone, abandoned to themselves at home. Obviously after 7-10 days, with the cytokine cascade and the amplification of the inflammatory process, they arrived at the hospital dying. Then, mechanical ventilation did the rest.”

Italian Doctor: in Covid I Acted as Usual, I Had No Death or ICU Hospitalization

This is sabotage. Of human health. On a massive worldwide scale. Who holds these people to account? Who prosecutes crimes, OF EMPERORS?

Martin Halvorson
I’ve talked a lot about the perils of delayed diagnosis and treatment of many illnesses. We all have.

But I haven’t heard many people say much about the obvious consequences of telling all patients with respiratory virus symptoms to stay home alone until they can’t breath!

Take bacterial pneumonia for instance – early intervention with antibiotics and it’s a pretty benign illness, let it advance so far that you’re having trouble breathing (and add in overwhelming fear and anxiety and isolation) and even the strongest would have trouble surviving!

The consequences of this sort of policy during the flu season last year (and this year) are monstrous!


Martin Larner
That was exactly what happened as described by the Italian Doctor I’ve posted about.

Rob Snyder
I was amazed by that article too. Have you found confirmation that such directives were given to doctors in other countries? This is the biggest story of the entire shit show if confirmed. And if doctors acquiesced to this en masse it demonstrates an absolutely shocking degree of both stupidity and obedience

Bill Gates is YOUR EMPEROR. He tells you to cover your face. He tells you to close your business. He tells you to avoid social contact. He tells your doctor to NOT assist you with the normal medications to treat lung illness. He tells you to be injected with synthetic experimental gene therapy. He tells you to eat laboratory grown “meat” only, and insects, and genetically modified fish. He tells you he’s going to dim the sun for your benefit. And your country’s “leaders” are sock puppets through whom Bill Gates speaks. And Your police and your military, follow his orders.

https://twitter.com/BillGates/status/1356374923078369281?s=20

Bill Gates in his video, in 90 seconds, tells you the whole idea. You should believe he means what he says:

He’s going to:

“test 20% of the entire population, every week”

https://twitter.com/BillGates/status/1356374923078369281?s=20

Notice he’s talking about the future. Not just the near future. The entire future, and the entire world. Notice he did not set an end point. He’s talking about ongoing, continuously, the entire foreseeable future. This is the plan. He tells you this. Listen. Obey.

He’s going to:

“get treatments out far faster, next time”

https://twitter.com/BillGates/status/1356374923078369281?s=20

He’s going to:

“manufacture monoclonal antibodies that can reduce death rates as much as 80%”

https://twitter.com/BillGates/status/1356374923078369281?s=20

What does that even mean? He doesn’t say. I guess I should just fill in the blank with my own magical thinking: HUMAN MORTALITY (ALL OF IT) WILL BE REDUCED BY 80%. I JUST NEED TO LISTEN TO THE WISE BENEVOLENT GENIUS HUMANITARIAN BILL GATES AND I HAVE AN 80% CHANCE OF LIVING FOREVER. BILL GATES: VANQUISHER OF DEATH!

He’s going to:

“develop new vaccines quickly, in large part due to this new mRNA platform… mRNA will become faster to develop, easier to store, and, lower cost. That’s a huge breakthrough.”

https://twitter.com/BillGates/status/1356374923078369281?s=20

Yeah, a huge breakthrough for full spectrum dominance.

There are two key words there: platform, and breakthrough. Read here the personal significance of the word “platform” to Bill Gates: https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/24/18715202/microsoft-bill-gates-android-biggest-mistake-interview

The breakthrough, is tightly bound with pervasive global surveillance, and “infectious disease first responder fire fighters”, tip of spear of the global (dictatorship) bio-security regime (platform ownership).

He OWNS YOU.

“It’s going to cost a lot of money. But…”

Bill Gates is selling:

“the best insurance policy the world can buy.”

https://twitter.com/BillGates/status/1356374923078369281?s=20

The arsonist sells fire insurance, and making an offer you can’t refuse.

Might as well see things as they are. Not some fantasy of benevolent kindness and generosity. Listen to what Bill Gates tells you. It’s right out in the open.

So is real science. It’s out there too. You can still find it.

You can choose what you want to follow.

Take a look again at real science, instead of Gate’s/Merkel’s ventriloquy of draconian and asinine ideas and fantasies of a thousand year reich of full spectrum dominance.

https://swprs.org (timely articles)

Facts about Covid-19

https://swprs.org/covid19-facts/

From the article above:

Facts about Covid-19

Updated: February 2021; Share onTwitter / Facebook
LanguagesCNCZDEENEOESFRGRHEHUITKOMSNLJPPLPTRORUSETR

Fully referenced facts about covid-19, provided by experts in the field, to help our readers make a realistic risk assessment. (Regular updates below).

“The only means to fight the plague is honesty.” (Albert Camus, 1947)

Overview

  1. Lethality: According to the latest immunological studies, the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) of covid-19 in the general population is about 0.1% to 0.5% in most countries, which is most closely comparable to the medium influenza pandemics of 1957 and 1968.
  2. Treatment: For people at high risk or high exposure, early or prophylactic treatment is essential to prevent progression of the disease. According to numerous international studies, early outpatient treatment of covid may reduce hospitalizations and deaths by about 80%.
  3. Age profile: The median age of covid deaths is over 80 years in most Western countries (but 78 in the US) and only about 5% of the deceased had no serious preconditions. The age and risk profile of covid mortality is therefore comparable to normal mortality, but increases it proportionally.
  4. Nursing homes: In many Western countries, up to two thirds of all covid deaths have occurred in nursing homes, which require targeted and humane protection. In some cases it is not clearwhether the residents really died of covid or of weeks of stress and isolation.
  5. Excess mortality: Up to 30% of all additional deaths may have been caused not by covid, but by the effects of lockdowns, panic and fear. For example, the treatment of heart attacks and strokes decreased by up to 40% because many patients no longer dared to go to hospital.
  6. Antibodies: By summer 2020, global hotspots such as New York City and Bergamo had reached antibody seroprevalence levels of approximately 25%. Capital cities such as Madrid, London and Stockholm were around 15%. Large parts of Europe and the US, however, were still below 5%. Above about 30%, a significant slowdown of the infection process has been observed.
  7. Symptoms: Up to 40% of all infected persons show no symptoms, about 80% show at most mild symptoms, and about 95% show at most moderate symptoms and do not require hospitalization. Mild cases may be due to protective T-cells from earlier common cold coronavirus infections.
  8. Long covid: About 10% of symptomatic people report post-acute or long covid, i.e. symptoms that last for several weeks or months. This also affects younger and previously healthy people with a strong immune response. The post-viral syndrome is known from severe influenza, too.
  9. Transmission: According to current knowledge, the main routes of transmission of the virus are indoor aerosols and droplets produced when speaking or coughing, while outdoor aerosols as well as most object surfaces appear to play a minor role.
  10. Masks: There is still little to no scientific evidence for the effectiveness of cloth face masks in the general population, and the introduction of mandatory masks couldn’t contain or slow the epidemic in most countries. If used improperly, masks may increase the risk of infection.
  11. Children and schools: In contrast to influenza, the risk of disease and transmission in children is very low in the case of covid. There was and is therefore no medical reason for the closure of elementary schools or other measures specifically aimed at children.
  12. Contact tracing: A WHO study of 2019 on measures against influenza pandemics concluded that from a medical perspective, contact tracing is “not recommended in any circumstances”. Contact tracing apps on cell phones have also failed in most countries.
  13. PCR tests: The virus test kits used internationally may in some cases produce false positive and false negative results or react to non-infectious virus fragments from a previous infection. In this regard, the so-called cycle threshold or ct value is an important parameter.
  14. Medical mismanagement: In the US and some other countries, fatal medical mismanagement of some covid patients occurred due to questionable financial incentives and inappropriate protocols. In most countries, covid in-hospital mortality has since decreased significantly.
  15. Lockdowns: In contrast to early border controls, lockdowns have had no significant effect on the pandemic. Rather, the WHO warned that lockdowns have caused a “terrible global catastrophe”and according to the UN, lockdowns may put the livelihood of 1.6 billion people at acute risk and may push an additional 150 million children into poverty.
  16. Sweden: In Sweden, covid mortality without a lockdown is comparable to a strong influenza season and close to the EU average. About 70% of Swedish deaths occurred in nursing facilities and the median age of Swedish covid deaths is about 84 years.
  17. Media: The reporting of many media has been unprofessional, has maximized fear and panic in the population and has led to a massive overestimation of the lethality and mortality of covid. Some media even used manipulative pictures and videos to dramatize the situation.
  18. Vaccines: Due to their rapid development, little is yet known about the long-term effectiveness and safety of the covid vaccines. Following several deaths, Norway advises against RNA vaccination in frail persons over 80 years of age. Some other groups of people are also advised against RNA vaccination because of possible complications.
  19. Virus origin: The origin of the new corona virus remains unclear, but the best evidence currently points to a covid-like pneumonia incident in a Chinese mine in 2012, whose virus samples were collected, stored and researched by the Virology Institute in Wuhan (WIV).
  20. Surveillance: NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden warned that the covid pandemic may be used to expand global surveillance. In several parts of the world, the population is being monitored by drones and facing serious police overreach during lockdowns.
See also
  1. On the treatment of Covid-19
  2. Studies on Covid-19 lethality 
  3. The evidence on face masks
  4. On post-acute (“long”) Covid
  5. On the origin of SARS-CoV-2